QM: Coordinate & Momentum Representation w/ Fourier Transform

  • Thread starter Thread starter LagrangeEuler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm Representation
LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
Coordinate representation ##\psi=\psi(x)##
Momentum representation ##\psi=\psi(p)##
Fourier transform
\psi(p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi\hbar}}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}\psi(x)e^{-\frac{ipx}{\hbar}}dx
I'm confused with this ##\hbar##? Why not
\psi(p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\frac{1}{\hbar}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}\psi(x)e^{-\frac{ipx}{\hbar}}dx?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because ∫exp(ikx) dk ≡ 2π δ(x). And therefore ∫exp(ipx/ħ) dp = 2π δ(x/ħ) = 2πħ δ(x).

Look at the normalization integral, with the 1/√2πħ factors included:

1 = ∫ψ*(p) ψ(p) dp = 1/(2πħ) ∫∫∫ψ*(x) exp(ipx/ħ) ψ*(x') exp(-ipx'/ħ) dp dx dx'

Do the p integral, using line 1:

= 1/(2πħ) ∫∫ψ*(x) ψ*(x') (2πħ) δ(x - x') dx dx'

Next do the x' integral, using the δ-fn. See we again get the correct normalization:

1 = ∫ψ*(x) ψ*(x) dx

Note that the factors of 2πħ canceled, showing that the 1/√2πħ was necessary!

EDIT: Hold on! I see you asked the exact same question on two consecutive threads!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top