QM Free Particle Approaching Infinite Barrier

leothelion
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Solved... i think. It's just Psi(x) = B sin kx

Homework Statement


Consider a free particle psi(x) = A*e^(ikx) approaching an infinite barrier from the left:
V = 0, x < 0 and V = oo, x >= 0. For this problem use only the time-independent
Schrodinger Equation.
a. Find the probability of being reflected from the barrier (recall that energy
must be conserved).
b. Find the total wavefunction Psi(x) for x < 0.

Homework Equations



Schroedinger's equation.

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, solving the wave equation gives the general solution

psi(x, 0) = A e^(ikx) + B e^(-ikx).

We know that Psi(x, 0) = 0 when x >= 0, since E < V = oo for all values of E. Part a asks to find the reflection coefficient using conservation of energy, but I did it this way:

Psi must be continuous at x = 0. Thus A + B = 0, implying that A = -B. Thus the reflection coefficient is 1. This also reduces psi(x, 0) = A sin kx.

However, I'm a little confused as to how to find Psi(x). My original work was that Psi(x) = integral(-oo to oo) phi(k) A sin kx dk

but my professor said that due to the conservation of energy, there are only so many allowed energy states. I'm a little confused about this. Is Psi(x, 0) = A e^(ikx) - A e^(-ikx)?

Any hints would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
leothelion said:
Solved... i think. It's just Psi(x) = B sin kx
Yep, that's it!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top