[QM] Help understanding this bra-ket solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter JBrandonS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bra-ket Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics, specifically related to an expression involving an operator and its eigenkets. The original poster is attempting to comprehend a particular line from Sakurai's book regarding the relationship between eigenkets and a Hermitian operator.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster describes their thought process in attempting to manipulate the expression using properties of Hermitian operators and orthonormal eigenkets. They express uncertainty about the intermediate steps and the meaning of the notation.
  • Another participant suggests a realization about multiplying by the identity operator, indicating a moment of clarity but still expressing uncertainty about the overall implications.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the notation and reasoning behind the expression. Some guidance has been offered through the realization of using the identity operator, but there is no explicit consensus on the complete understanding of the topic.

Contextual Notes

The original poster references a specific expression from Sakurai's text, indicating that they are working through advanced concepts in quantum mechanics. There is mention of uncertainty regarding the classification of the thread within the forum's categories.

JBrandonS
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am working my way though Sakurai's book on Quantum MEchanics and am having some problems understanding the bra-ket notation. I keep believing I understand everything there is to it but then he will do something in a single line that I cannot understand. This is one of them. If someone could help me out it would be great.

Homework Statement



Show why the following in correct: <a''|A|a'>=<a'|A|a'>\delta_{a'a''}= a'\delta_{a'a''}

A is an hermitian operator. a' and a'' are the eigenkets and eigenvalues of A.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The only method I can think of to coming up with the final solution is the following, which may not even be correct.

Use A|a'> = a'|a'> since A is hermitian and rewrite as <a''|a'|a'>
Since a' is real a'=a'^* so we can rewrite as a'<a''|a'>
From here we can use the fact that a'' and a' are orthonormal eigenkets from the same operator so <a''|a'> = \delta_{a'a''} and we finally have a'\delta_{a'a''}

However this method does no provide the middle expression which has me really thrown off. I am not sure if I am doing everything correct and I do not know how Sakurai came to that. I am also not 100% on what all this means either.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ugh I don't know how I just saw what they did. Multiply by the identity operator (a') between <a''| and A. It all falls together then. Still not 100% sure what all it means but I'll work on it.
 
JBrandonS said:
Ugh I don't know how I just saw what they did. Multiply by the identity operator (a') between <a''| and A. It all falls together then. Still not 100% sure what all it means but I'll work on it.

I think this post belongs under Advanced Physics.
 
rude man said:
I think this post belongs under Advanced Physics.

I checked the rules for the advanced physics and it said that just because it's QM doesn't mean it belongs there. So I figured this would be a good place to put it. Either way this question can be closed now as I figured it out. Just can't find out how to mark it for closure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K