QM: Spin -orbit coupling: Solve [(L.S), L]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aaronse_r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coupling Qm Spin
Aaronse_r
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] QM: Spin -orbit coupling: Solve [(L.S), L]

Homework Statement


Griffiths problem 6.16
Solve the following commutators (he lists a bunch but i can't get even the first one)

(a) [(L.S) , L]
(b) [(L.S) , S]
(c) [(L.S) , L^2]

there's a few more, but i think if i get the idea then i can do the rest. I know it isn't supposed to be hard but for some reason i can't get it.

Thank you any help you can give.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only thing you have to know is the commutators

[L_i,L_j]=\epsilon_{ijk}\,L_k \quad [L_i,S_j]=0

and the general rule

[A\,B,C]=A\,[B,C]+[A,C]\,B
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top