QM - Transmission coefficient for square well

AI Thread Summary
A homework problem involves calculating the transmission coefficient for 5 eV electrons encountering a square well of depth 10 eV and width 7.65 * 10^-11 m. The transmission coefficient formula provided is T = [1 + (V0^2 sinh^2(κa) / (4E(V0 - E)))]^-1, with κ^2 defined as (8mπ^2 / h^2)(V0 - E). Initial calculations yielded T = 0.388, but feedback indicated the correct answer should be T = 0.75. The error was traced to a misapplication of the identity for sinh, which was incorrectly noted. After correcting the identity and recalculating, the expected result aligns with the feedback received.
DeltaFunction
Messages
14
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



A steady stream of 5 eV electrons impinges on a square well of depth 10 eV. The width of the well is 7.65 * 10^-11 m. What fraction of electrons are transmitted?

Homework Equations


The following equation for the transmission coefficient, T, is given:
T = [1 + \frac{V_0 ^2 sinh^2 κa}{4E(V_0 - E)}]^-1 (**that is meant to be ^-1 for the whole bracket - apologies, this is my first time using LaTex**)
Where κ^2 = \frac{8mπ^2}{h^2}(V_0 - E)

We are also provided with a not-so-subtle hint that sinh~iθ = i~sinh~θ

The Attempt at a Solution



So I have assigned the following values based on the information:

a = 7.65 * 10^-11 m
E = 5 eV
V = - 10 eV
m = 9.11 * 10^-31 kg

It then seems like it should be very straightforward. I calculate ka and found this to be 1.52i. Then using the definition of sinh I calculate sinh^2 κa = -4.73.
Plugging the other values in I arrive at T = 0.388 which seemed reasonable to me, but... The postgrad who marked my work fed back to me that the numerical answer he had was T = 0.75.
I'd be really grateful if someone can check the calculation for me, because it's really bugging me that I can't see my error.
Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The h in the denominator for κ2 should be h2, I guess.

I can confirm 1.52i, but if I put this in the final formula I get 0.75.
Well, WolframAlpha does.
 
Thank you, yes it should be h^2, I've now corrected that. I guess I'll go through the figures again carefully :/
 
I've realized my stupid mistake. I copied down the identity incorrectly. A moments thought and I would have seen that sinh~iθ = i~sinh~θ is nonsense :rolleyes: embarrassing
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top