Qns on potential energy and forces

AI Thread Summary
The potential energy of a body at point P, given by V = kx^2, leads to a force of 2kx directed towards the reference point O. The initial misunderstanding involved calculating force as kx based on the work-energy principle, but this applies only when force is constant. In cases of variable force, the correct approach is to differentiate the work done with respect to distance, resulting in the force being the negative derivative of potential energy. This indicates that the force acts towards the origin, confirming the attraction towards point O. Understanding the relationship between potential energy and force is crucial for accurately determining the dynamics of the system.
coffeebeans
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello, i hope i posted this in the correct section..

I have a question:
the potential energy of a body when it is at point P a distance x from a reference point O is given by V = kx^2, where k is a constant. what is the force acting on the body when it is at P?

the correct ans is 2kx in the direction of PO

the ans i got is kx in the direction OP. as work = force x distance, so force required to bring the body to point p is kx^2 / x .

could some please explain why is the correct ans so? thnk u so much!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Work is "force times distance" as long as the force is constant- if the force is a variable then the work is given by \int f(x)dx. Notice that this involves a "constant of integration". It is standard to choose that constant so that potential energy is 0 at some specific point; potential energy is always relative to some given point.

Going the other way, if work is a constant times distance, W= Cx then force is that constant: F= Cx/x= C. But if a more general function then F= \frac{dW}{dx}.
 
The potential energy is positive. So there is an attraction toward the origin.

The force = - (dW/dx) = -2kx.
So the force is directed from the point P to the point O, the origin.
bye
 
Thnx alot!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top