I Understanding Quantum Cascade Lasers

Karl330
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Hello I am struggling to understand the concept of Quantum cascade lasers. I am doing research on a 20 period In0.33Ga0.67As (3.1 nm)/Al0.90In0.10As (7.2 nm) superlattice and would like to fully understand how a quantum cascade laser works. I also have not taken quantum mechanics yet so I might be a little slow to understand. Here is the question

I keep seeing images like this for a quantum cascade laser. Why does the band energy (y-axis) go down for every layer as shown here and what do the squiggly lines mean (I know these are the electron wavefunctions but I'm not entirely sure I get what is going on)?

upload_2017-9-5_13-52-52.png


In addition to this how does population inversion happen with each active layer for each electron to get to the highest energy level. Is it some type of pumping from phonons?

Here is what a laser physics book says
The electron leaves the lowest subband by spatial escape to the neighboring conducting region.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QC lasers are subtle beasts. Let's start with "Why does the band energy (y-axis) go down for every layer as shown here". The answer is that a voltage is applied across an alternating series of high- and low-bandgap materials. The squiggly lines represent electrons tunneling from one well to the next (intraband tunneling), losing energy in discrete amounts as it goes and emitting large numbers of (typically mid-wave IR) photons.

Does that help?
 
I understand that a voltage is applied which sends electrons tunneling through barriers and quantum wells but I am confused on what you mean by high and low bandgap materials. For example a 20 period In0.33Ga0.67As (3.1 nm)/Al0.90In0.10As (7.2 nm) is a superlattice that I am studying and I am confused on how the bandgap changes from layer to layer. I have found this online and also trying to understand it because I thought a quantum well was an area between two thin semiconducting material and here it just says the white InGaAs is a quantum well and the black AlInAs is a barrier.
?temp_hash=515144f176973886e3c339617a486b76.png
 
Karl330 said:
I understand that a voltage is applied which sends electrons tunneling through barriers and quantum wells but I am confused on what you mean by high and low bandgap materials. For example a 20 period In0.33Ga0.67As (3.1 nm)/Al0.90In0.10As (7.2 nm) is a superlattice that I am studying and I am confused on how the bandgap changes from layer to layer. I have found this online and also trying to understand it because I thought a quantum well was an area between two thin semiconducting material and here it just says the white InGaAs is a quantum well and the black AlInAs is a barrier.
View attachment 210434

Your InGaAs material has a bandgap energy of about 0.95 eV (http://www.batop.com/information/Eg_InGaAs.html), and your InAlAs badgap energy is about 1.5 eV. Does that help?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top