Quantum Dots and the "Particle in a 1-D Box" Model

spaghettibretty
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The "particle in a box" is the simplest quantum system. Despite this, it still reveals a lot of important new quantum features. Please use the "particle in a 1-D box" model to explain the reason why when the size of a quantum dot gets smaller, the wavelength of the emitted photon due to the n=1⇒n=2 transition becomes shorter (color shifts to blue).

Homework Equations



speed of light = wavelength * frequency
(it isn't listed in the question, but I use it for my answer)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not really sure how to tackle this question and give a sufficient answer. I tried reading around on the "particle in a 1-D box" model as well as quantum dots, but I'm not sure what I'm saying is sufficient.

My current answer is basically that the oscillation period of a particle in a 1-D box will decrease if the length of the box is reduced. A lower oscillation period equals a higher frequency, which, in turn, equals a lower wavelength. Therefore, if the length of the box decreases, the oscillation period decreases, and the wavelength decreases. This can be applied to a quantum dot. As the quantum dot's size is reduced, the frequency of its emitted photons will rise and cause the wavelength of those photons to decrease. The decreasing of the wavelength means that the perceived color of the photons will be more blue in comparison.

Is this answer enough? Are its components even correct? This material wasn't really covered by my professor and it's more of a self-research problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oscillation period of a particle in a 1-D box ? It's abox, not a (harmonic) oscillator . The question is about photons that are emitted when transitions from higher energy levels to lower energy levels occur. (n=1 ⇒ n=2 is not one of these; an error in the text ?).
 
BvU said:
Oscillation period of a particle in a 1-D box ? It's abox, not a (harmonic) oscillator . The question is about photons that are emitted when transitions from higher energy levels to lower energy levels occur. (n=1 ⇒ n=2 is not one of these; an error in the text ?).

Oh, my mistake. It's suppose to be n=2⇒n=1. If the oscillation period thing is incorrect, that pretty much tears down my whole argument.
On another thought, I also know that if there are more nodes in the 1-D box, then there is a higher energy and higher energy equals higher frequency. However, I'm not sure how that ties in with the quantum dots.
 
It's not about the particles themselves. It's about the energy change of the (charge carrying) particles when they go from a higher energy state to a lower energy state. That energy difference is sent off in the form of a photon. So you want to find an expression for the energies of the possible states, and see if these depend on the size of the box. (A quantum dot is considered as a box here).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top