Quantum Entanglement: Explained with an Example

tell_me_why
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Quantum entanglement ?

Ok, after beating my head with numerous link on net somehow Icould not grasp the idea of quantum entaglement...all i understand is two particles somehow become co-related and then when separated to any distance still maintain co-realation , the moment you see one the other property is defined.

Whats wrong in this..whats weird in this ..i can't understand.

Take an example ..i got 2 pens red and blue .

now i put each in box and ask my friends to take them away.

then one of my friend open box and find the pen is red so definately the other would be blue.

also until my friend didn't open the box , either of them do not knew what color they have.

Can someone help me understanding this ...please given an example also instead of pasting me any link to internet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


tell_me_why said:
Ok, after beating my head with numerous link on net somehow Icould not grasp the idea of quantum entaglement...all i understand is two particles somehow become co-related and then when separated to any distance still maintain co-realation , the moment you see one the other property is defined.

Whats wrong in this..whats weird in this ..i can't understand.

Take an example ..i got 2 pens red and blue .

now i put each in box and ask my friends to take them away.

then one of my friend open box and find the pen is red so definately the other would be blue.

also until my friend didn't open the box , either of them do not knew what color they have.

Can someone help me understanding this ...please given an example also instead of pasting me any link to internet.


Your example is fine, but for one small detail. That was understood in 1935 when the EPR paper was written. But it is spin statistics at other angles that cause the problems. This was pointed out by Bell in 1964. The relationship is cos^2(theta) and your example will not work for some groups of angles. Usual examples are 0/120/240 degrees (a la Mermin) or 0/22.5/45/67.5 degrees (CHSH).
 


tell_me_why said:
please given an example also instead of pasting me any link to internet.

In order to see the "strangeness" of the outcome for entangled states in examples like the ones Dr. Chinese mentions, you really have to study one of them in detail. You shouldn't expect someone to write one of them up completely for you here, when it's been done many times elsewhere on the Web.

I like Mermin's example, myself. He published it in an article titled "Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory." You can easily find it with a Google search for "Mermin moon". I'm pretty sure Dr. Chinese has a link to it on his Web site.

If you have specific questions about this or some other example, feel free to ask!
 


jtbell said:
In order to see the "strangeness" of the outcome for entangled states in examples like the ones Dr. Chinese mentions, you really have to study one of them in detail. You shouldn't expect someone to write one of them up completely for you here, when it's been done many times elsewhere on the Web.

I like Mermin's example, myself. He published it in an article titled "Is the Moon There When Nobody Looks? Reality and the Quantum Theory." You can easily find it with a Google search for "Mermin moon". I'm pretty sure Dr. Chinese has a link to it on his Web site.

If you have specific questions about this or some other example, feel free to ask!

Echoing the above... here is my website link for the Mermin example:

http://drchinese.com/David/Bell_Theorem_Easy_Math.htm

This has easy math, but as jtbell says, you need to work through an example that DOESN'T support your contention to see the issues involved.
 


You are not the only one who want to understand the REAL PHYSICAL SENSE of the term “entanglement“ : see the thread “Entanglement and Concurrence: asking for definitions”.

May be you will find it in arXiv:0706.2488v2 :-)))
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top