Quantum Field Theory book suggestions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around self-study approaches to Quantum Field Theory (QFT) for someone with a solid background in mathematics and physics. The individual expresses dissatisfaction with Peskin & Schroeder due to its heavy focus on calculations without sufficient conceptual framework, making it less suitable for self-study. They have found Weinberg's book enjoyable but recognize it may not be feasible to master all volumes quickly. Suggestions for alternative QFT texts include Ryder, which is praised for its clarity and coverage, and Zee, which emphasizes conceptual understanding. Siegel's "Fields" is also considered a potential choice for its balance of depth and accessibility. Participants recommend exploring online lecture notes and other introductory texts like Bjorken and Drell or Aitchison and Hey to build a strong theoretical foundation before moving on to string theory. The individual plans to transition to "String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction" after QFT.
guhan
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
I have a fairly good background in mathematics (algebra, analysis, topology, differential geometry)... and a good physics background (till QM, general relativity). I am looking to study Quantum Field Theory on my own. I do not intend to master QFT completely and all its techniques, but want to understand its general framework and move on to a String theory book as soon as I can.

I tried few pages of Peskin & Schroeder and did not like it much. I have started with Weinberg's book (vol 1). I like it very much so far, but I don't think I will be able to finish till Supersymmetry (vol 3) fairly soon. And even if I do, I would not be able to remember all that I read. So, I want to leave that aside as a reference book that I can look up to, on and off, in latter years.

I have looked around for a 'quick' and 'deep enough' QFT book and I think Siegel's Fields ( http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9912205 ) ebook will be a good one. I want a second opinion on that and also some other suggestions (of other books). I went through Srednicki's contents and have a good feeling about that too, though I am not sure how it compares to Siegel's Fields.

ps: After QFT, I am planning to start with "String Theory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction" by Katrin Becker, et al.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to start with string theory a.s.a.p., you don't need to go through all volumes of Weinberg.

I highly advise you not to use Peskin and Schroeder for as an introductory book it is highly unreadable. The focus lies heavily on actually calculating stuff, but there's hardly any motivation on the why and how. Especially if you're not following a course but are more into self-study then this book is going to take you two years getting through (Peskin uses the books for three semester courses)

I personnally recommend Ryder as an introductory book. It covers a lot of topics in sufficient detail and it's also quite pleasent to read. Zee is also a nice book to have on the side, since in this case the focus lies at a conceptual level.

You can also try to find some online lecture notes, which are usually free. There are some good ones out there.
 
If you have enough knowledge in Relativistic quantum mechanics, I've been told, that you can actually follow Peskin and Schroeder with a paper and pencil to work through what he does.

I recommend starting with Relativistic QM by Bjorken and Drell or Gauge theories by Aitchison and Hey (I assume you have already looked into Griffiths Particle Physics?), and then move onto QFT (Pesken and Schroeder, Itzykson and Zuber, Ryder, Srednicki, and Mandl and Shaw are all recommended by my professors here).

If you are interested in supersymmetry, Ryder has an entire chapter dedicated to SUSY. Also, you might be interested in checking out "A Supersymmetry Primer" by Stephen Martin (Arxiv: hep-ph/9709356)
 
Thanks everyone.
I didnt like Peskin & Schroeder because he goes into the calculations too much and doesn't give a good enough 'unified' (for lack of a better word) conceptual and mathematical structure of QFT. I had thought of using Siegel's Fields and have Srednicki on the side mainly because Siegel doesn't spend too much time with calculations and presents the fundamental theory and its connections to scalar field theories and moves on.
I will take a look at the other books suggested above (though not the particle physics books - I would like to start with books that give me a strong theory than results).
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
This is part 2 of my thread Collection of Free Online Math Books and Lecture Notes Here, we will consider physics and mathematical methods for physics resources. Now, this is a work in progress. Please feel free comment regarding items you want to be included, or if a link is broken etc. Note: I will not post links to other collections, each link will point you to a single item. :book:📚📒 [FONT=trebuchet ms]Introductory college/university physics College Physics, Openstax...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top