Quantum Field Theory: Stationary Point of the Effective Action

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
We have the effective action which obeys \frac{\delta \Gamma[\varphi]}{\delta \varphi(x)}=J(x) where and we are told the stationary point, \varphi_0, of this action, \frac{\delta \Gamma[\varphi_0]}{\delta \varphi(x)}=0, corresponds to the vacuum expectation value.
(This is out of my notes - there is a discussion around p380 of Peskin & Schroeder on this although it goes a bit more in depth than my notes...)

Anyway, on the next page, he just says that we can write

\Gamma[\varphi]=i \displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{n!} \int d^dx_1 \dots \int d^dx_n \varphi(x_1) \dots \varphi(x_n) \Gamma_n (x_1, \dots , x_n)

Can anybody explain to me where this formula has come from? And what is \Gamma_n? He hasn't defined that either.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Up to the factor of i this is just a power-series expansion for a functional. \Gamma_n can be expressed in terms of functional derivatives of \Gamma evaluated at \phi = 0 as written.
 
fzero said:
Up to the factor of i this is just a power-series expansion for a functional. \Gamma_n can be expressed in terms of functional derivatives of \Gamma evaluated at \phi = 0 as written.

Ok. So I found that \Gamma_n = - i \frac{\delta^n \Gamma [ \varphi ] }{ \delta \varphi(x_1) \dots \delta \varphi(x_n)}|_{\varphi=0}

But shouldn't this be evaluated at \varhpi = \varphi_0 i.e. the minimum of the effective potential?
 
latentcorpse said:
Ok. So I found that \Gamma_n = - i \frac{\delta^n \Gamma [ \varphi ] }{ \delta \varphi(x_1) \dots \delta \varphi(x_n)}|_{\varphi=0}

But shouldn't this be evaluated at \varhpi = \varphi_0 i.e. the minimum of the effective potential?

The whole expansion should be made around \varphi=\varphi_0. Your reference is either being sloppy or you've left out information.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top