Quantum Mechanics and Eigenfunctions Checks

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining whether specific wave functions are eigenfunctions of the momentum operator by checking the eigenvalue equation. The first wave function, ψ(x) = √(2/L) cos(xπ/L), is analyzed by applying the momentum operator and checking if the result is proportional to the original function. Participants clarify that differentiating the wave function is necessary to assess proportionality, and they discuss the implications of the results, particularly regarding the need for the eigenvalue to be real. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between sine and cosine functions in this context. Overall, the thread highlights the mathematical approach required to verify eigenfunctions in quantum mechanics.
TFM
Messages
1,016
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For each of the following wave functions check whether they are eigenfunctions of the momentum operator, ie whether they satisfy the eigenvalue equation:

\hat{p} \psi(x) = p\psi(x) with \hat{p} = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x} and p is a real number.

For those that are eigenfunctions, calculate the eigenvalue p, the expectation value〈\hat{p}〉, and the standard deviation Δ\hat{p} ̂.

(a)

\psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} cos(\frac{x\pi}{L}) for -L/2 \leq x \leqL/2

0 for x > L/2, x < -L/2

(b)

\phi(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{L}}e^{ikx} for 0 \leq x \leq L with k is real [\tex]<br /> <br /> 0 for x &gt; L, x &lt; 0<br /> <br /> <br /> (c)<br /> <br /> \chi (x) = 2xe^{-x} for 0 \leq x<br /> 0 for x &lt; 0<br /> <br /> <br /> <h2>Homework Equations</h2><br /> <br /> N/A<br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> <br /> Okay, I have gone some way through the first part.<br /> <br /> \hat{p} = -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial}<br /> <br /> -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\sqrt{\frac{2}{L}}cos\frac{x\pi}{L})<br /> <br /> -i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}(cos\frac{x\pi}{L})<br /> <br /> With Limits between L/2 and -L/2<br /> <br /> -i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} (-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{x\pi}{L})^{L/2}_{-L/2}<br /> <br /> -i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} ([-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{L\pi}{2L}]-[-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{-L\pi}{2L}])<br /> <br /> -i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} ([-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{\pi}{2}]-[-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{-\pi}{2}])<br /> <br /> But I am unsure where I am supoosed to go from here...<br /> <br /> To show it is a Eigenfunction, I need to get rid of the i at the very begining, but I am unsure how to do this?<br /> <br /> Any suggesstions where to rpoceed?<br /> <br /> Thanks in advance,<br /> <br /> TFM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not need the boundary conditions to check if a function is an eigenstate so no need to replace x by L/2 or -L/2. These limits only enter when you calculate the expectation values.


You must ask yourself if the function you get after applying i \hbar \partial_x to \psi is proportional to the wavefunction itself. If yes, then the wavefunction is an eigenstate and the constant of proportionality is the eigenvalue. If not, the function is not an eigenstate.
 
Last edited:
So do I need to differnitiate it then?
 
TFM said:
So do I need to differnitiate it then?

Yes. Sorry, there was a typo in my post and the partial derivative did not show up. Yes, you must apply i \hbar \partial_x to \psi and check if the result is proportional to the wavefunction itself. Is it possible to write \sin(\pi x/l) as a constant times \cos (\pi x/L) in such a way that the result will be valid for any value of x ? If the answer is no, then this wavefunction (the cos) is not an eigenstate of the momentum operator
 
Okay so the original wavefunction is:

\psi(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} cos(\frac{x\pi}{L}) --- (1)

The \hat{p} function is:

-i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} (-\frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{x\pi}{L}) Which can be simplified to:

i\hbar \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} * \frac{\pi}{L}sin\frac{x\pi}{L}

So now I have to see if this result is proportional to (1).

So I have to find how to write sin(\frac{\pi x}{L}) as C cos(\frac{\pi x}{L})

Can this actually be done, though, since the only relation I know that will link sin and cos is sin^2(\theta) + cos^2(\theta) = 1?

Also, do I need to get rid of that i at the beginning, since p needs to be a real number?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top