Quantum Mechanics Book for First Year Physics Students

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Intro Qm Type
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for quantum mechanics textbooks suitable for first-year physics students. Participants share various texts they believe are appropriate for someone preparing for a second-year quantum mechanics course, while considering the level of mathematical knowledge required.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants recommend "Intro to Quantum Physics" by French and Taylor as a suitable introductory text.
  • Others suggest Eisberg and Resnick, though some express concern that it may be too advanced for a first-year student.
  • Daniel proposes early editions of Schiff's book and mentions Linus Pauling's 1935 course for chemists, noting the necessity of a solid mathematical background.
  • One participant mentions that many colleges in the USA do not offer a full course in quantum mechanics until the third or fourth year, instead providing an introduction to modern physics that includes some quantum mechanics.
  • Several participants caution against using Griffiths, with differing opinions on its appropriateness for beginners.
  • Michael Morrison's "Understanding Quantum Physics" is highlighted as an accessible text for beginners.
  • Feynman's "QED: The Strange Theory of Matter and Light" is recommended for its clear explanations without heavy equations, while Albert Messiah's two-volume set is suggested as a more comprehensive reference.
  • One participant indicates they are using R A Serway, C J Moses, and C A Moyer's "Modern Physics" as their prescribed textbook and seeks additional resources to enhance their understanding of quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the suitability of different textbooks, indicating that there is no consensus on a single best choice. Some texts are recommended by multiple participants, while others are contested, reflecting differing views on their appropriateness for first-year students.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of mathematical prerequisites, with some texts requiring knowledge of differential equations and linear algebra. The discussion also highlights the variability in curriculum structure across different colleges and universities.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1
Does anyone know an especially good book/textbook on quantum mechanics that is written for an audience with first year physics knowledge?

I will be donig 2nd year QM next year so a book that describes QM well but obviously not a thorough treatment.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like French and Taylor's Intro to Quantum Physics text.
 
Check out Eisberg and Resnick. I have heard good things about it, but it might be a bit too much for you.

- harsh
 
Try one of the early editions of Schiff's book. The QM intro course for chemists written by Linus Pauling in 1935 is also useful.

U should know some high level mathematics, though...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
Try one of the early editions of Schiff's book. The QM intro course for chemists written by Linus Pauling in 1935 is also useful.
U should know some high level mathematics, though...
Daniel.

Fantastic books but i doubt someone with just first year physics knowledge could grasp these books. I would have to vote for "An introduction to quantum physics" by French and Taylor as well, a good intro to the world of quantum mechanics. I used this book first.
 
pivoxa15 said:
I will be donig 2nd year QM next year

Where are you studying, and what book will you be using in that course?

At most colleges and universities in the USA, second-year physics majors don't take a full course in QM, as far as I know. Instead, they take an "introduction to modern physics" course that includes some QM. There are several textbooks at this level, e.g. Beiser or Krane or Taylor/Zafiriatos/Dubson. I think most standalone QM textbooks are ained at the third/fourth year level, and are easier to follow if the student has been through an "intro modern" course already.
 
French and Taylor is a good text. McGervey is also good. Stay away from Griffiths. Schaums outline is really cheap and has a load of problems and solutions.
 
The Schaum's outline is almost certainly too advanced for anyone who has only had 1 year of physics.

I would recommend Krane's Modern Physics if you have not yet taken differential equations and linear algebra. If you do have that much math then I would recommend either Eisberg and Resnick's Quantum Physics or Brehm and Mullin's Introduction to the Structure of Matter. Both books are good, but I recommend Eisberg and Resnick more highly because it includes perturbation theory, while Brehm and Mullin does not.
 
Dr Transport said:
Stay away from Griffiths.

Why? It seemed to be just fine to me.
 
  • #10
I've heard good things about it too, but it is certainly too advanced for this student.
 
  • #11
By far the easiest QM text of them all is Michael Morrison's "Understanding Quantum Physics-- A Users Manual."
 
  • #12
Be sure and pick up Feynman's inexpensive paperback "QED: The Strange Theory of Matter and Light". Nothing explains quantum mechanics better for a beginning student. No equations, but he explains Feynman diagrams even. It really is a fantastic piece of "physics for poets" that only Feynman could put together.

On the other hand, if you want a reference that will remain on your shelf forever, but is still readable at the very earliest level, get Albert Messiah's two volume set, now packaged in a single paperback.

Carl
 
Last edited:
  • #13
inha said:
Why? It seemed to be just fine to me.

I do not like his style of presentation...
 
  • #14
Thanks for all the suggestions. My prescribed textbook is
R A Serway, C J Moses and C A Moyer, Modern Physics. Saunders
I am working through the QM bit by myself at the moment but would like to complement it with better books on the topic. I would also like to have a broader understanding of the subject other than picking which formula to use but that will only come with practice I guess.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K