Quantum Mechanics; Expectation value

Stephen_G
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At t=0, the system is in the state
gif.latex?%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B%5Csqrt%7B2%7D%7D%5Cbinom%7B1%7D%7Bi%7D.gif
. What is the expectation value of the energy at t=0?

I'm not sure if this is straight forward scalar multiplication, surprised if it was, but we didn't cover this in class really, just glossed through it. If someone could walk me through this, it would be most appreciated.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I just multiplied the 1/sqrt2 by 1 and i. I'm certain that this is not the correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Stephen_G said:
I just multiplied the 1/sqrt2 by 1 and i.
How, and why?

You need to know the energies of the two states, at least as variables.

If you measure which state the particle is in, what are the possible results? What is the energy associated with each result? What is the probability?
 
Would the energies be the eigenvalues? I got those in the first portion of that question.

The first question asked for the eigenvlaues and vectors for the hamiltonian:
26i%5Csqrt5%20%26%20%5C%5C%20-i%5Csqrt5%20%26-2%20%26%20%5C%5C%20%26%20%26%20%5Cend%7Bpmatrix%7D.gif
 
Please post the full question with all relevant context, otherwise there is too much guesswork involved.

In general, how do you find the expectation value of an operator?
 
Sorry about that, I will in the future.
But, for the your question, you would just insert your expectation value into your braket <Ψ|A|Ψ> and solve, correct?
 
That works, sure.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top