Quantum Mechanics Particle moving in 1-D potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a quantum mechanics problem related to a particle's wavefunction in a one-dimensional potential. The user is attempting to derive the probability distribution from the wavefunction at time t=0, expressing uncertainty about their calculations. They initially multiplied the wavefunction by its conjugate but received advice to keep it in a factored form for clarity. Additionally, they are struggling with determining the normalization constant |A|, with suggestions to use the normalization condition for this purpose. Overall, the conversation focuses on clarifying the wavefunction's properties and finding the correct approach to solve the problem.
20930997
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
I've been attempting this one for a while now and so far it has been to no avail. The question itself is in the attached document.

I am given an expression that defines the wavefunction moving in 1-D over an interval and the time component is fixed with t=0.

2. Homework Equations

〖|ψ(x,0)|〗^2 = prob dist, in which likelihood of finding a particle at that point can be inferred.


3. The Attempt at a Solution

first of all I assume that (A) is a complex constant and as a result i multiply the wavefunction by its conjugate to get the following,

〖|ψ(x,0)|〗^2=|A|^2 (x^4-2x^3 a+x^2 a^2) which I am not sure is correct and furthermore have no idea how to sketch it.

any guidance would be appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Quantum Mechanics Question.png
    Quantum Mechanics Question.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 546
Physics news on Phys.org
20930997 said:
first of all I assume that (A) is a complex constant and as a result i multiply the wavefunction by its conjugate to get the following,

〖|ψ(x,0)|〗^2=|A|^2 (x^4-2x^3 a+x^2 a^2) which I am not sure is correct and furthermore have no idea how to sketch it.
That's correct, but it would probably be better not to multiply it out initially. Just leave it as
$$|\Psi(x,0)|^2 =
\begin{cases}
|A|^2 (x-a)^2 x^2 & 0 \le x \le a \\
0 & \text{otherwise}
\end{cases}$$ Surely, you must have done curve sketching in algebra and calculus. Where does the function vanish? Where is it positive? Where is it negative? Where does it attain a maximum or a minimum?
 
ahh yes that makes it a lot clearer, thanks for the help!
 
I'm also having difficulty with part b of this question.

I tried using a symmetry approach to try and deduce the value of |A| but in my working the |A|^2 term ends up being canceled which is of no use to me.

again any pointers would be much appreciated.
 
You need to use the normalization condition to determine |A|.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top