Quantum Mechanics Particle moving in 1-D potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a quantum mechanics problem related to a particle's wavefunction in a one-dimensional potential. The user is attempting to derive the probability distribution from the wavefunction at time t=0, expressing uncertainty about their calculations. They initially multiplied the wavefunction by its conjugate but received advice to keep it in a factored form for clarity. Additionally, they are struggling with determining the normalization constant |A|, with suggestions to use the normalization condition for this purpose. Overall, the conversation focuses on clarifying the wavefunction's properties and finding the correct approach to solve the problem.
20930997
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
I've been attempting this one for a while now and so far it has been to no avail. The question itself is in the attached document.

I am given an expression that defines the wavefunction moving in 1-D over an interval and the time component is fixed with t=0.

2. Homework Equations

〖|ψ(x,0)|〗^2 = prob dist, in which likelihood of finding a particle at that point can be inferred.


3. The Attempt at a Solution

first of all I assume that (A) is a complex constant and as a result i multiply the wavefunction by its conjugate to get the following,

〖|ψ(x,0)|〗^2=|A|^2 (x^4-2x^3 a+x^2 a^2) which I am not sure is correct and furthermore have no idea how to sketch it.

any guidance would be appreciated!
 

Attachments

  • Quantum Mechanics Question.png
    Quantum Mechanics Question.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 542
Physics news on Phys.org
20930997 said:
first of all I assume that (A) is a complex constant and as a result i multiply the wavefunction by its conjugate to get the following,

〖|ψ(x,0)|〗^2=|A|^2 (x^4-2x^3 a+x^2 a^2) which I am not sure is correct and furthermore have no idea how to sketch it.
That's correct, but it would probably be better not to multiply it out initially. Just leave it as
$$|\Psi(x,0)|^2 =
\begin{cases}
|A|^2 (x-a)^2 x^2 & 0 \le x \le a \\
0 & \text{otherwise}
\end{cases}$$ Surely, you must have done curve sketching in algebra and calculus. Where does the function vanish? Where is it positive? Where is it negative? Where does it attain a maximum or a minimum?
 
ahh yes that makes it a lot clearer, thanks for the help!
 
I'm also having difficulty with part b of this question.

I tried using a symmetry approach to try and deduce the value of |A| but in my working the |A|^2 term ends up being canceled which is of no use to me.

again any pointers would be much appreciated.
 
You need to use the normalization condition to determine |A|.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top