How Do I Solve These Quantum Mechanics Problems from Binney's Textbook?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving specific quantum mechanics problems from Binney's textbook, particularly problems 2.3, 2.5, 2.8, and 2.9. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding expected values and operators, with specific references to Ehrenfest's theorem and the role of the identity operator. There is a suggestion to tackle each problem in separate threads for clarity and better assistance. Additionally, contributors stress the need for the original poster to show more work and conduct further research to facilitate effective help. Overall, the thread aims to guide the poster through complex quantum mechanics concepts while encouraging independent problem-solving.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JamesBinney/qb.pdf[/PLAIN]

page 42 in pdf (34 in the book)

problems 2.3, 2.5, 2.8, 2.9 (there are more but I'll start with these)

Homework Equations



I'll just include these for particular problems

The Attempt at a Solution

2.3

a. ## \langle \psi | Q | \psi \rangle ## is the expected value of Q in the quantum state ## | \psi \rangle ##; ## | \langle q_n | \psi \rangle | ^2 ## - probability of ##q_n## occurring in state ## | \psi \rangle ##

b. the first operator is the identity operator, the second is the "observable" operator (bad phrasing?)

c. ## u_n (x) = \langle x | q_n \rangle ##, so ## \langle q_n | \psi \rangle = u_n^*(\psi) ##; I'm not really sure where to go from there
2.5

a. ## \langle x \rangle = \langle \psi | \hat{x} | \psi \rangle ##

b. ## \langle x^2 \rangle = \langle \psi | \hat{x}^2 | \psi \rangle ##

c. ## \langle p_x \rangle = \langle \psi | \hat{p} | \psi \rangle##

I won't bother writing down the last one because I'm pretty sure those are wrong anyway2.8- i don't know where to start with this problem, sorry2.9

Ehrenfest's theorem:

$$ i \hbar \frac{d}{dt} \langle \psi | Q | \psi \rangle = \langle \psi | [ Q, H ] | \psi \rangle + i \hbar \langle \psi | \frac{dQ}{dt} | \psi \rangle $$

I'm not sure where to go from there.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would suggest devoting one thread per problem rather than trying to discuss all of them at once.

You also need to show more work. We can't do your homework here but we can't help get you out of a bind so do a little more research and show more work.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top