[Quantum mechanics] Step barrier |R|^2 and |T|^2

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
Aaron7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a step barrier at x=0, V_0 > E
I am given:
ψi = e^i(kx−ωt) --->
ψr = R e^i(−kx−ωt) <---

ψt = T e^(−αx−iωt) --->

Part of question I am confused about: State the two boundary conditions satisfied by the wave function at x = 0 and hence find expressions for |R|^2 and |T|^2

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


I have already worked out an equation for alpha in the previous part.

ψ1 = ψi + ψr
ψ2 = ψt

I started to apply the conditions ψ1(0) = ψ2(0) to get 1 + R = T
and d/dx ψ1(0) = d/dx ψ2(0) to get ik - iRk = -αT

I solved the above to get R = (ik +αT) / ik with T = 1 + R etc
I understand that |R|^2 = R x R* and |T|^2 = T x T*
However I am told that T = 1 - R since these are probability coefficients. Do I solve with T = 1-R (probability coefficients) or T = 1+R (using ψ1(0) = ψ2(0))? I am confused which one to use and why.

Many thanks.
 
on Phys.org
Aaron7 said:
ψi = e^i(kx−ωt) --->
ψr = R e^i(−kx−ωt) <---

ψt = T e^(−αx−iωt) --->

ψ1 = ψi + ψr
ψ2 = ψt

I started to apply the conditions ψ1(0) = ψ2(0) to get 1 + R = T
and d/dx ψ1(0) = d/dx ψ2(0) to get ik - iRk = -αT

However I am told that T = 1 - R since these are probability coefficients.
Well, ask yourself: should you expect the wavefunction to violate the Schrödinger equation at x=0, and if so, why?

The probability interpretation only makes since with respect to a normalization, usually the L2 norm for wavefunctions. Unfortunately, the friendly plane wave that makes naive calculations so simple wreaks havoc on the L2 norm. (Plane waves for free particles actually live in a different kind of quantum space than normalizable/quantized wavefunctions.) I don't know what you mean by calling R and T "probability coefficients", but I believe that your equations for R and T (the ones that you derived) are correct (assuming that the wavefunction obeys the Schrödinger equation, which T = 1 - R would actually violate at x = 0).

I think it doesn't even make sense to compare |R|2 to |T|2 as probabilities, because I think that the probability of transmission is zero, but I will have to think back to my QM (and that is a long way back).