[Quantum mechanics] Step barrier |R|^2 and |T|^2

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of reflection and transmission coefficients |R|^2 and |T|^2 for a quantum mechanical step barrier where V_0 > E. The boundary conditions at x=0 lead to the equations 1 + R = T and ik - iRk = -αT. The confusion arises from whether to use T = 1 - R or T = 1 + R, with the consensus that the derived equations for R and T are correct, as T = 1 - R would violate the Schrödinger equation at x=0. The interpretation of R and T as probability coefficients is debated, emphasizing the importance of normalization in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wave functions and boundary conditions.
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation and its implications for wave functions.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their application in quantum mechanics.
  • Concept of probability coefficients in quantum mechanics and normalization of wave functions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics, focusing on step potentials.
  • Learn about normalization of wave functions and the L2 norm in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the derivation and interpretation of reflection and transmission coefficients in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the differences between plane wave solutions and normalizable wave functions.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists dealing with wave functions, and anyone studying the behavior of particles in potential barriers.

Aaron7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a step barrier at x=0, V_0 > E
I am given:
ψi = e^i(kx−ωt) --->
ψr = R e^i(−kx−ωt) <---

ψt = T e^(−αx−iωt) --->

Part of question I am confused about: State the two boundary conditions satisfied by the wave function at x = 0 and hence find expressions for |R|^2 and |T|^2

Homework Equations


N/A


The Attempt at a Solution


I have already worked out an equation for alpha in the previous part.

ψ1 = ψi + ψr
ψ2 = ψt

I started to apply the conditions ψ1(0) = ψ2(0) to get 1 + R = T
and d/dx ψ1(0) = d/dx ψ2(0) to get ik - iRk = -αT

I solved the above to get R = (ik +αT) / ik with T = 1 + R etc
I understand that |R|^2 = R x R* and |T|^2 = T x T*
However I am told that T = 1 - R since these are probability coefficients. Do I solve with T = 1-R (probability coefficients) or T = 1+R (using ψ1(0) = ψ2(0))? I am confused which one to use and why.

Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Aaron7 said:
ψi = e^i(kx−ωt) --->
ψr = R e^i(−kx−ωt) <---

ψt = T e^(−αx−iωt) --->

ψ1 = ψi + ψr
ψ2 = ψt

I started to apply the conditions ψ1(0) = ψ2(0) to get 1 + R = T
and d/dx ψ1(0) = d/dx ψ2(0) to get ik - iRk = -αT

However I am told that T = 1 - R since these are probability coefficients.
Well, ask yourself: should you expect the wavefunction to violate the Schrödinger equation at x=0, and if so, why?

The probability interpretation only makes since with respect to a normalization, usually the L2 norm for wavefunctions. Unfortunately, the friendly plane wave that makes naive calculations so simple wreaks havoc on the L2 norm. (Plane waves for free particles actually live in a different kind of quantum space than normalizable/quantized wavefunctions.) I don't know what you mean by calling R and T "probability coefficients", but I believe that your equations for R and T (the ones that you derived) are correct (assuming that the wavefunction obeys the Schrödinger equation, which T = 1 - R would actually violate at x = 0).

I think it doesn't even make sense to compare |R|2 to |T|2 as probabilities, because I think that the probability of transmission is zero, but I will have to think back to my QM (and that is a long way back).
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K