Quantum Mechanics Treatment of Harmonic Oscillator

jameson2
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given the Hamiltonian for the harmonic oscillator H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2 , and [x,p]=i\hbar. Define the operators a=\frac{ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}} and a^+=\frac{-ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}}

(1) show that [a,a^+]=1 and that H= \hbar\omega(a^+a+\frac{1}{2})

(2) Let N=a^+ a so that H= \hbar\omega(N+\frac{1}{2}). Denote the eigenstates of N by |n>: N|n>=n|n>. Are the eigenvalues of N real? Why? Are the states {|n>} complete? Why?

Use [a,a^+]=1 to show that a^+ |n> = c_+|n+1> and a |n> = c_-|n-1> where the c values are constants. (Hint: consider Na^+ |n>=(a^+N+[N,a^+])|n> and Na|n>=(aN+[N,a])|n>. Show that [N,a^+]=a^+ , [N,a]=-a.)


Homework Equations


Above


The Attempt at a Solution


(a) I got his part easy enough.

(b)I know the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real, but I don't know how to show that the product of a and it's adjoint is Hermitian (or if it's not not?). I don't know how to approach the completeness part of the question.

I've worked out the parts in the hint that ask you to show the two commutator identities and I understand why the other equations in the hint are true, but I've no idea how to apply the hint to solving the actual question. What's mainly throwing me is how to get |n> and |n+1> in the same equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jameson2 said:

Homework Statement


Given the Hamiltonian for the harmonic oscillator H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2 , and [x,p]=i\hbar. Define the operators a=\frac{ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}} and a^+=\frac{-ip+m\omega x}{\sqrt{2m\hbar \omega}}

(1) show that [a,a^+]=1 and that H= \hbar\omega(a^+a+\frac{1}{2})

(2) Let N=a^+ a so that H= \hbar\omega(N+\frac{1}{2}). Denote the eigenstates of N by |n>: N|n>=n|n>. Are the eigenvalues of N real? Why? Are the states {|n>} complete? Why?

Use [a,a^+]=1 to show that a^+ |n> = c_+|n+1> and a |n> = c_-|n-1> where the c values are constants. (Hint: consider Na^+ |n>=(a^+N+[N,a^+])|n> and Na|n>=(aN+[N,a])|n>. Show that [N,a^+]=a^+ , [N,a]=-a.)

Homework Equations


Above

The Attempt at a Solution


(a) I got his part easy enough.

(b)I know the eigenvalues of a Hermitian operator are real, but I don't know how to show that the product of a and it's adjoint is Hermitian (or if it's not not?). I don't know how to approach the completeness part of the question.
Usually, one of the first things you learn about adjoints is how to find the adjoint of a product. Are you sure you haven't already covered this before and just forgotten?
I've worked out the parts in the hint that ask you to show the two commutator identities and I understand why the other equations in the hint are true, but I've no idea how to apply the hint to solving the actual question. What's mainly throwing me is how to get |n> and |n+1> in the same equation.
What you want to show is that N(a†|n⟩) = (n+1)(a†|n⟩). What does this tell you about the state a†|n⟩?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top