Quantum Operators - Eigenvalues & states

knowlewj01
Messages
100
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



an operator for a system is given by

\hat{H}_0 = \frac{\hbar \omega}{2}\left[\left|1\right\rangle\left\langle1\right| - \left|0\right\rangle\left\langle0\right|\right]

find the eigenvalues and eigenstates

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



so i formulated this operator as a matrix

\frac{\hbar \omega}{2}<br /> \left( \begin{array}{cc}<br /> -1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\ \end{array} \right)<br />
and found the eigenvalues to be -1 and 1

but when i put them back into the eigenvalue equation Hx = λx [x is a 2 row column vector with elements x1 and x2]
i get nonsense, something like

for λ=1:
x1 = -x1
x2 = x2

for λ=-1:
x1 = x1
x2 = -x2

am i missing something important here?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
knowlewj01 said:
but when i put them back into the eigenvalue equation Hx = λx [x is a 2 row column vector with elements x1 and x2]
i get nonsense, something like

for λ=1:
x1 = -x1
x2 = x2

for λ=-1:
x1 = x1
x2 = -x2

am i missing something important here?

thanks.

Those look fine with no nonsense. Try solving each set of equations. One equation will fix one component, while the other doesn't fix anything. This is because, as with any eigenvector equation, a multiple of a solution is still a solution. You should just pick a convenient choice for the unknown variable in order to write down a solution.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top