Quantum physics - time dependant changes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a quantum mechanics problem involving a particle in a one-dimensional box that expands rapidly from width 'a' to '2a'. The key points include calculating the probability of the particle being in the new ground state immediately after the expansion and determining the required rapidity of the expansion for valid calculations. The energy levels before and after the expansion are established, with the initial ground state energy being h^2/8ma^2 and the new ground state energy h^2/32ma^2. The wavefunction remains unchanged during the rapid expansion, but the eigenstates do change, necessitating the use of the inner product between the original and new wavefunctions to find the probability. The integration limits for this calculation are confirmed to be from -a/2 to a/2, leading to the final probability determination.
david_clint
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a particle of mass m is in the groundstate of a 1D box with width a. the box then expands rapidly and symmetrically to width 2a. i). What is the probability that the particle is in the new groundstate immediately after the expansion? and ii). how rapid must this expansion be for your calculation to be valid?


Homework Equations


timescale for change must be hbar/ |E_alpha -E_ beta|
i think for probabilty you use that the statefunction evolves in time according to the Schrodinger equation and probabilty is the mod squared of the wave-function.


The Attempt at a Solution


  • pre expansion i got the energy of the groundstate as h^2/8ma^2
  • and after expansion h^2/32ma^2
  • the wavefunction is SQRT(PI/2a) cos (PI.x/a) before and after the expansion.

for part ii). i got (3/64PI) * (ma^2/h) for how rapid the expansion must be
for part i). i am stuck! [We were given the hint to use the fourth postulate to compute the probability that given the state-function (above), a measurement of energy will give the ground state energy of the expanded box (which i worked out above). ]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
david_clint said:
the wavefunction is SQRT(PI/2a) cos (PI.x/a) before and after the expansion.
But not everywhere! The wavefunction only takes that form within a certain domain of x. What is that domain, before the expansion?

For rapid expansion, you can assume that the wavefunction does not change during the expansion. But once the box expands, the eigenstates do change; even though the wavefunction was originally the ground state, it is no longer going to be the ground state. But it will have some component of the ground state in it, and you can figure out just how much by taking the inner product of the wavefunction with the new ground state. From that, you can find the probability.
 
diazona said:
But not everywhere! The wavefunction only takes that form within a certain domain of x. What is that domain, before the expansion?

For rapid expansion, you can assume that the wavefunction does not change during the expansion. But once the box expands, the eigenstates do change; even though the wavefunction was originally the ground state, it is no longer going to be the ground state. But it will have some component of the ground state in it, and you can figure out just how much by taking the inner product of the wavefunction with the new ground state. From that, you can find the probability.

The wavefunction has that form between minus and plus a/2 i think.
Is the new ground state wavefunction: sqrt(1/a) sin (PI. x/2a).
which i then multiply by the 'original' wavefunction and integrate. Also what will then be the integration limits: minus and plus a/2?
Then mod squared of the inner product would give the probability. Thanks
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top