Quantum SHM with Finite Potential and Hermite Polynomials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Larry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Shm
Larry89
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Let it be V=(1/2)m(w^2)(x^2) for -L<x<L and V=A finite for x elsewhere.

is it obvious to use the wavefunction for the SHO that has infinite limits for the (-L,L) region and the usual decay of tunneling for the parts outside x</L/, and then play with the boundary conditions to determine the constants?

thanks for any discussion.

PS: I am particularly interested in the case that the particle energy is less than A but any further ideas are more than welcomed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should use Hermite polynomials (H_n) with arbitrary non-integer n's
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top