Quantum transmission resonances

b2386
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Here is my question:

In the E>U_0 potential barrier, there should be no reflected wave when the incident wave is at one of the transmisson resonances. Assuming that a beam of particles is incident at the first transmission resonance, E=U_0+(\frac{\pi^2 h^2}{2mL^2}), combine the continuity conditions to show that B=0. Here are the continuity conditions:

1st A+B=C+D

2nd k(A- B)=k^{'}(C-D)

3rd Ce^{ik^{'}L}+De^{-ik^{'}L}=Fe^{ikL}

4th k^{'}(Ce^{ik^{'}L}-De^{-ik^{'}L})=kFe^{ikL}

A couple more equations that we already know are k=\sqrt{\frac{2mE}{h^2}} and k^'=\sqrt{\frac{2m(E-U_0)}{h^2}

Here is my attempted solution:

I divided the 4th equation by K and then set equation 3 and 4 equal to each other. I then used the new equation to solve for C in terms of D giving me

C=De^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K} where I substituted \frac{\pi}{L} in for k'.

I substituted this result into the first equation to now give me

A+B={De^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K} + D.

Solving for D gives me

\frac{A+B}{e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K} + 1} = D

Now, plugging in our solutions for D and C into the 2nd equation

\frac{(A+B)e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K}}{e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K}+1}-\frac{A+B}{e^{-2i \pi}\frac{k^{'}+k}{k^{'}-K}+1}=\frac{k}{k^{'}}(A-B})

At this point, it seems impossible to simplify the equation to a point where it is obvious that B = 0. Am I on the right track or is there an easier way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an easier way. :smile:

I see that you've already evaluated k' at the transmission resonance. Plug this value into your 3rd and 4th equations and get rid of the exponentials on the left side. You should see that the left side of these two now look similar to the right side of your first two equations, and a little algebra should give you B=0.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top