Quaternions And Complex Numbers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the relationship between quaternions and complex numbers, confirming that quaternions can be viewed as an extension of complex numbers despite the non-commutative nature of their unit vectors i, j, and k. The equivalence of the quaternion a+bi+0j+0k to the complex number a+bi is affirmed, while also noting that different representations exist. Quaternions can be represented as traceless Hermitian 2x2 matrices over complex numbers, which can generate unitary matrices that correspond to 3D rotations. The Pauli matrices serve as a common basis for this representation, highlighting their significance in physics. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the mathematical connections and applications of quaternions in representing rotations.
Kambiz_Veshgini
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1.
Are the HAMILTON‘ian unit vectors i, j, k still valid beside the imaginary
unit i(Sqrt(-1))?
Can we expand quaternions using complex numbers?

2.
Is the quaternion a+bi+0j+0k equal to the complex number a+bi ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
1. what does valid mean. yes the quarternions can be realized as en extension of the complex numbers, though as i doesn't commute with j or k, there are several ways of doing this and different sources may adopt different ways.

3. Yes and no. a+bi+0j+0k=a+bi IN the quartenions.
 
Hi Kambiz,
one picture/representation of quaternions (i,j,k)
you can have is of them being traceless hermitian 2*2 matrices
over complex numbers.

(Then exponentiating combinations of them, you generate 2*2 unitary matrices, which we can map to ordinary rotations in 3 dimensions - in fact, I believe, it was Hamilton's obsession with `adding rotations' (in the manner that one might add vectors so effortlessly) that led him to write down the quaternionic algebra in the first place.)

A common basis for this 2*2 complex matrix representation of
quaternions is given by the Pauli matrices, used extensively in physics!

This is the lowest dimension representation of the quaternionic
algebra [sometimes called the spinor representation].

best, Anton.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top