Quaternions: Extension of Real Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Topolfractal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quaternion Theory
Topolfractal
Messages
76
Reaction score
7
Quaternions are generalizations of 3- vectors, in the same as complex numbers are generalizations of 2- vectors. Should quaternions be considered an extension of the real numbers as the complex numbers were?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Topolfractal said:
Quaternions are generalizations of 3- vectors, in the same as complex numbers are generalizations of 2- vectors. Should quaternions be considered an extension of the real numbers as the complex numbers were?
Wouldn't they be considered generalizations of 4-vectors? A quaternion has four components.
 
Oh I thought quaternions were just adding 1 more part to a complex number. I must be way wrong.
 
Topolfractal said:
Oh I thought quaternions were just adding 1 more part to a complex number. I must be way wrong.
The "quatern" part comes from Latin, meaning "four times."

A quaternion has the form q = ai + bj + ck + d, where i, j, and k are such that i2 = j2 = k2 = -1.
 
Topolfractal said:
Oh I thought quaternions were just adding 1 more part to a complex number. I must be way wrong.

You are not alone. My recollection is that Hamilton was trying to add one more dimension to complex number to make a three part number. He wasn't able to find a way to make add just one dimension and have it be an extension of the complex numbers. Quaternions, however, are an extension to the complex numbers.
 
DrewD said:
You are not alone. My recollection is that Hamilton was trying to add one more dimension to complex number to make a three part number. He wasn't able to find a way to make add just one dimension and have it be an extension of the complex numbers. Quaternions, however, are an extension to the complex numbers.
Thank you, and you for the longest time having not researched quaternions in depth, I always thought they were a 3-d version of the real numbers with three components. After reading the Wikipedia article on quaternion I understand Hamilton's motivation behind the four parts now.
 
Topolfractal said:
Quaternions are generalizations of 3- vectors, in the same as complex numbers are generalizations of 2- vectors. Should quaternions be considered an extension of the real numbers as the complex numbers were?
Yes, undoubtedly!
 
Back
Top