Query on physics of a tennis ball

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the energy transformations of a tennis ball when dropped, specifically gravitational potential energy (GPE) converting to kinetic energy (KE) during the fall. Upon impact, the ball loses some KE to heat and sound, and the energy stored in the ball's compression, akin to elastic potential energy (ePE), allows it to bounce back. The bounce height is influenced by the ball's internal pressure; a well-inflated ball compresses less upon impact, resulting in less energy loss and a higher bounce. Additionally, heating the ball increases its internal pressure, potentially enhancing its bounce. Understanding these energy dynamics is crucial for grasping the physics behind a tennis ball's behavior.
Confuzzled
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
As title reads...
In my As physics class today the topic of this arrived, which has been annoying me ever since, i am hoping you may be able to help, as hours of searching the internet i have failed. :(

I understand that when a ball is held at a certain height that it has stored energy, GPE. And when this ball is dropped this energy turns into Kinetic Energy, my query is on what is the energy, at the point it hits the ground? I would assume elastic energy, but am unclear.

Also if this said ball was to be heated, I it would bounce a higher distance due to temperature being proportional to pressure? And pressure being the answer to how much something would bounce? But why is this? What does pressure do to the insides of that tennis ball?

Thanks Confuzzled
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As the ball is falling, the gPE 'turns' into Kinetic, Heat and Sound energies (albeit, the last two are slight in comparison).

Similarly, when the ball hits the ground, it 'loses' Kinetic energy to more heat and sound, and indeed as you said ePE.

Conservation of energy means that the ball will not bounce higher than the height you dropped it from, unless you some how superheated it during it's fall.
 
The question about pressure is interesting; think about it in your every day life. A poorly inflated basketball does not bounce nearly as well as a well inflated one, why?

The answer relates to your first question, I think. We can easily analyze the fall of the tennis ball as a straight conversion between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. However, when the ball hits the ground KE is zero and PE is zero, so how can it bounce back? The ball behaves (roughly) like a spring in that it is compressed and stores energy, which it releases and bounces back up. However, a tennis ball is by no means a perfect spring so the more the compression, the greater the loss of energy due to heat, sound, and other external factors.

So, when you have a tennis ball with high internal pressure, as it hits the ground it has a much higher "spring constant", i.e it will compress far less and thus suffers less loss due to external factors and will bounce back with a height closer to that of the original.

Hope this makes sense!
Cheers
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
301
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
13K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top