Question about a figure in relativity textbook

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on Figure 2-4 from "Spacetime Physics" by Taylor & Wheeler, which depicts the trajectory of a ball thrown in a room that is either on a ledge or in free fall. Participants express confusion regarding the accuracy of the illustration, particularly in how the ball's trajectory is represented when the room is in free fall. One participant argues that the ball should follow a straight line trajectory, similar to its behavior in space, while another points out that the diagram inaccurately depicts the ball's launch direction, which should be clarified to avoid misunderstanding. The consensus among some participants is that the book's diagram does not accurately reflect the ball's motion given the initial conditions, emphasizing the importance of clearly illustrating the ball's direction in discussions of relativity and perception. The conversation highlights the complexities of visualizing motion in different frames of reference, particularly in free fall scenarios.
DocZaius
Messages
365
Reaction score
11
Figure 2-4 in "Spacetime Physics" by Taylor & Wheeler

The figure illustrates the effects of free float on the perceived trajectory of a ball thrown in a room that is on a ledge and then in a room that is sawed free from the ledge.

In both cases, the ball is launched at the same speed and direction, and sprays ink on the side wall of the room. In all cases, the ball is thrown from right to left. Here is the illustration the book shows.

book.JPG


I have trouble with that illustration since it seems to me the ball would not make that ink trajectory in the free fall situation. To me it would seem to make this trajectory:

mine.JPG


Can someone tell me why the book is right and I am wrong? To me it seems that once the ball is launched, it does not care if the house is free falling or not - it will arrive at the same spot relative to the stable side of the cliff. Why would it end up where the book says it does? Also, once the ball is launched in a free float situation, it seems it will behave as if having been launched int he same manner in the middle of space, and follow a straight line 45 degree angle trajectory to the opposite top corner of the room.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the right half of the second pic, you have the ball starting out in the upper left hand corner of the room at an angle of minus 45 degrees to the vertical. That can't be right as the two sides have to correspond at t=0, where the ball is in the lower left side of the room thrown at an angle of plus 45 degrees.

It might help to draw the positions of both the ball and the room at 1 second intervals. Note that the ball must follow the same trajectory in between the times where it's launched and where it hits the floor of the room, no matter what the room does, since there's no other force on the ball but gravity.
 
Daverz said:
In the right half of the second pic, you have the ball starting out in the upper left hand corner of the room at an angle of minus 45 degrees to the vertical. That can't be right as the two sides have to correspond at t=0, where the ball is in the lower left side of the room thrown at an angle of plus 45 degrees.

It might help to draw the positions of both the ball and the room at 1 second intervals. Note that the ball must follow the same trajectory in between the times where it's launched and where it hits the floor of the room, no matter what the room does, since there's no other force on the ball but gravity.

In every diagram, the ball is thrown from the bottom right side of the room towards the left side at a +45 degree angle. This includes the right half of the second pic. Imagine the ball spraying ink on the back side of the room during its trajectory.

edit: Actually this made me realize that the book had the ball thrown from the bottom left side of the room. I wish it had shown direction of ball in the diagram. My diagram is accurate if the ball has been thrown from the bottom right side of the room. So that solves the problem - the book did not properly show ball direction in a diagram that tackles the relativity of perception (an important time to be explicit about conditions).
 
Last edited:
DocZaius said:
In every diagram, the ball is thrown from the bottom right side of the room towards the left side at a +45 degree angle. This includes the right half of the second pic. Imagine the ball spraying ink on the back side of the room during its trajectory.

edit: Actually this made me realize that the book had the ball thrown from the bottom left side of the room. I wish it had shown direction of ball in the diagram. My diagram is accurate if the ball has been thrown from the bottom right side of the room. So that solves the problem - the book did not properly show ball direction in a diagram that tackles the relativity of perception (an important time to be explicit about conditions).


I agree. If the book states the ball is going from right to left then the diagram is incorrect (it should look like your diagram).
 
DocZius;
I agree with you. The person in the room would accelerate with the ball, and not see any vertical movement, only horizontal motion.
 
phyti said:
DocZius;
I agree with you. The person in the room would accelerate with the ball, and not see any vertical movement, only horizontal motion.

But the ball has an initial component of velocity in the vertical direction.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
This is part 2 of my thread Collection of Free Online Math Books and Lecture Notes Here, we will consider physics and mathematical methods for physics resources. Now, this is a work in progress. Please feel free comment regarding items you want to be included, or if a link is broken etc. Note: I will not post links to other collections, each link will point you to a single item. :book:📚📒 [FONT=trebuchet ms]Introductory college/university physics College Physics, Openstax...
Back
Top