Question about an image charge problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jefferson Yun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Image
AI Thread Summary
To solve the image charge problem for a grounded conducting plane and sphere, one must place image charges symmetrically opposite to the actual charge with respect to the boundary. For a grounded conducting plane, the image charge is equal in magnitude but opposite in sign, positioned at the same distance from the plane. For a grounded conducting sphere, the configuration involves a more complex relationship, typically requiring the use of a point charge and a specific distance based on the sphere's radius. The discussion highlights the confusion regarding whether the problem is in 2D or 3D, emphasizing the need for clarity in boundary conditions. Understanding these configurations is crucial for accurately applying the method of image charges in electrostatics.
Jefferson Yun
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


.
image charge problem.jpg

With this problem, how should I set image charges so as to satisfy the same boundary condition?
And if possible, could you let me know how can that image charge configuration be deduced?
Thanks for reading.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, I first put images charges just at the opposite side of the planar and spherical boundary. But I don't know what to do next.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess the boundary is like this in 3D, right? :
Capture.PNG


Do you know how to set up image charge for grounded conducting plane and for grounded conducting sphere?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Jefferson Yun
arpon said:
I guess the boundary is like this in 3D, right? :
View attachment 107796
arpon said:
I guess the boundary is like this in 3D, right? :
View attachment 107796

Do you know how to set up image charge for grounded conducting plane and for grounded conducting sphere?
Do you know how to set up image charge for grounded conducting plane and for grounded conducting sphere?
No, actually it was 2d. But that situation is confusing as well. Could you let me know how should I set image charges in that situation, if possible?
And I know how to set the image charges for a ground conducting sphere or a plane. I know how to for a hemispherical bump attached on a plane as well.
 
Untitled.png

If you know how to set mirror charges for grounded conducting plane and sphere, this picture is enough hint for you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top