Question about coefficient of kinetic friction

AI Thread Summary
To find the coefficient of kinetic friction between the ice and the puck, the initial speed of the puck is 5.0 m/s, and it comes to rest after traveling 20 m. The key is to use the relationship between frictional force and acceleration, applying Newton's Second Law (F=ma). By equating the frictional force to the mass times acceleration, the mass cancels out, allowing for the calculation of the coefficient of kinetic friction. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between friction, acceleration, and the forces involved. This approach simplifies the problem, demonstrating that the mass is not needed to solve for the coefficient.
catapultum_habeo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A hockey player hits a puck with her stick, giving the puck an initial speed of 5.0 m/s. If the puck slows uniformly and comes to rest in a distance of 20 m, what is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the ice and the puck?

I know that this question must be rather easy, and that my mind has missed some logical leap in order to complete it.

Given the equation for kinetic friction (I can't format, so I'm not sure how to write this...)

f(sub k)=(mu)(normal force)

How can I solve for the coefficient (f sub k) without the mass? It seems that without the mass I am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a force (friction) you need to find the acceleration. What happens when you equate your friction force to Newton's Third, F=ma?
 
Wonderful things happen.

I wonder why I didn't think of that. -blush-

Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top