Question about coulomb's force.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DIMSKK
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
To achieve maximum Coulomb's repulsion between two charges, "Q-q" and "q", one must differentiate the expression for the force between the charges with respect to "q" and set the derivative to zero. This mathematical approach identifies the condition for maximum force, as it determines the optimal distribution of charge. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between "Q" and "q" in this context. Clarification was sought on why differentiation is necessary and whether to differentiate with respect to "Q" or "q". Ultimately, the inquiry was resolved, confirming the correct method for finding the maximum repulsion condition.
DIMSKK
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. A certain charge "Q" is to be divided into two parts, "Q-q" and "q". What is the relation of "Q" to "q" if two parts, placed at a given distance apart, are to have the maximum coulomb's repulsion?

I am unable to find the condition when there is a maximum Coulomb's repulsion. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in Advance

DIMSKK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you tried so far?
 
Write down the expression for the force between the charges. Find the differentiation with respect to q and equate it to zero. That gives you the condition for the maximum coulomb's repulsion.
 
rl.bhat said:
Write down the expression for the force between the charges. Find the differentiation with respect to q and equate it to zero. That gives you the condition for the maximum coulomb's repulsion.

Why find the differentiation with respect to q and then equate it to 0? I mean why force will be maximum when we do this? Can anyone explain? Moreover, whether we differentiate the expression with "Q" or "q"?
 
Last edited:
Now I have found what is the reason. Thank you very much for help rl.bhat.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How can voltage between unlike charges decrease with proximity?
Replies
4
Views
755
Point charge with very thin metal sheet along a spherical surface
Replies
21
Views
2K
Find the magnitude of the electric force from 3 charges at vertices of a cube
Replies
17
Views
2K
Calculating Charge and Force Using Coulomb's Law and Trigonometry
Replies
6
Views
8K
Two spring-coupled masses in an electric field (one of the masses is charged)
Replies
1
Views
853
Coulomb force and charge equilibrium on the xy-plane
Replies
1
Views
2K
How Do You Calculate the Electric Charge on a Suspended Cork Ball?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Electrostatics - find the work done
Replies
4
Views
2K
How to apply Coulomb's law for a system with a dielectric slab?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Velocity of two masses due to electric potential energy
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top