Question about differential cross section

Clara Chung
Messages
300
Reaction score
13
Homework Statement
Attached below
Relevant Equations
Attached below
242124

242125

I have attached the two pages in my notes and I have the following question.
1. Where have the n_t*l gone in 9.9? (According to 9.5 why do they disappear?)
2. Why J_s=sigma_tot J_i? The dimension of flux is per m^2 and sigma is per area too, the dimension is not right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clara Chung said:
View attachment 242124
View attachment 242125
I have attached the two pages in my notes and I have the following question.
1. Where have the n_t*l gone in 9.9? (According to 9.5 why do they disappear?)
2. Why J_s=sigma_tot J_i? The dimension of flux is per m^2 and sigma is per area too, the dimension is not right...
Looks like an error to me...
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
Yes, insert ##n_t l## into (9.9) in such a way that the units are consistent on both sides.

A physical reality check: if ##l = 0## or ##n_t = 0##, i.e. the target disappears completely, what should we expect ##J_s## to be, regardless of ##J_i##? :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Clara Chung
jtbell said:
Yes, insert ##n_t l## into (9.9) in such a way that the units are consistent on both sides.

A physical reality check: if ##l = 0## or ##n_t = 0##, i.e. the target disappears completely, what should we expect ##J_s## to be, regardless of ##J_i##? :smile:
Yes, it should be zero :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top