Question about distance using Newton's Laws of Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a crate sliding after a pushing force is removed. In part (a), doubling the crate's mass while keeping the initial velocity constant leads to a misunderstanding about the role of the pushing force and friction, with some participants arguing that friction must be considered since the crate eventually stops. In part (b), when the initial velocity is doubled, the same confusion arises regarding the inclusion of the pushing force and the effects of friction. Ultimately, it is clarified that the initial velocity is sufficient for determining the distance slid, and friction is implicitly involved in stopping the crate. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying Newton's laws and understanding the forces at play in motion.
sona1177
Messages
171
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A crate pushed along the floor with velocity Vi slides a distance d after the pushing force is removed.

a)If the mass of the crate is doubled but the initial velocity is not changed, what distance does the crate slide before stopping? Explain.

b) If the initial velocity of the crate is doubled to 2vi but the mass is not changd, what distance does the crate slide before stopping? Explain.


Homework Equations



F=ma
F=max (object is moving horizontally)

The Attempt at a Solution



a) Fnetx=nx + wx + tx where t stands for the pushing force, n is the normal force, and w is weight pulling down on the object.
nx=0
wx=0
Tx=max
Tx/m=ax

Kinetics Equation:
V2=Vi2 + 2a(Xf-Xi)
0=Vi2 + 2a(Xf-Xi)
-Vi2=2(Tx/m)d (where d stands for Xf- Xi)
Doing algebra: d=-mVi2/ (2*Tx) (in this equation only the Vi is squared, in the denominator, the answer is (2 times Tx). I hope that is clear.

b) -m * 2 * Vi2/2 *Tx (in this equation its 2 times the initial velocity squared divided by 2 times Tx) therefore the 2's cancel out and I get the same answer as I did for part a -m* Vi2/Tx=d

I hope this makes sense. Is my work and answer correct? I'm not sure if this was the answer the book was looking for. Thank you kindly for taking the time to help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, all the pushing force does is to give the crate an initial velocity and then it is removed. So Tx =0 and should not be a part of the subsequent motion of the object.
Secondly, you have omitted the force of kinetic friction. How does that figure into the picture?
 
kuruman said:
First off, all the pushing force does is to give the crate an initial velocity and then it is removed. So Tx =0 and should not be a part of the subsequent motion of the object.
Secondly, you have omitted the force of kinetic friction. How does that figure into the picture?

The crate slides a distance d only after the pushing force is removed. So doesn't the pushing factor have to be included? And my book says to ignore friction unless the problem asks to include it. This problem does not. And if I don't include the pushing force, the answer becomes 0/m=ax, meaning acceleration is zero since the normal force and weight force do not have x components. Can you please help guide me with this? Thank you kindly.
 
Please Help! Thank you.
 
kuruman is right on both counts.

You should ignore the pushing force...in a sense it's built into the initial velocity. Also, you have to assume there is some kinetic friction because parts (a) and (b) imply the object comes to a stop.
 
sona1177 said:
The crate slides a distance d only after the pushing force is removed. So doesn't the pushing factor have to be included?
No. Only the velocity that the crate has at the instant the force is removed needs to be included.
And my book says to ignore friction unless the problem asks to include it. This problem does not.
It does implicitly. What stops the crate if not friction?
And if I don't include the pushing force, the answer becomes 0/m=ax, meaning acceleration is zero since the normal force and weight force do not have x components. Can you please help guide me with this? Thank you kindly.
Why 0 = max? How about friction = max?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top