Question about finding a component of the electric field

AI Thread Summary
To find the x component of the electric field, Ex(x,0,0), from the electric potential V(x,y,z), the correct approach is to take the partial derivative of V with respect to x while keeping y and z constant. Plugging in zero for y and z before differentiating is valid and will yield the correct result. The notation for the electric field E is clarified as E = (Ex, Ey, Ez) = (∂V/∂x, ∂V/∂y, ∂V/∂z). This method ensures that the calculation accurately reflects the electric field at the specified point. Understanding the proper application of partial derivatives is essential for accurate results in electromagnetism.
aftershock
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Let's say I have the electric potential as a function of x, y, and z: V(x,y,z)

Now I want to find the x component of the electric field along the x-axis: Ex(x,0,0)


I could take the derivative of the potential wrt x and then plug in zero for y and z.

However if I was to plug in zero for y and z in the potential function, and then derive, would that be valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi aftershock! :smile:

your notation is odd … E = (Ex,Ey,Ez) = (∂V/∂x,∂V/∂y,∂V/∂z)

∂V/∂x means the derivative of V wrt x, keeping y and z fixed, so yes if you fix y = yo, z = zo, that would give you the correct value of Ex at (xo,yo,zo)
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top