Question about flow of electrons and electric current

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why electric current is defined as flowing in the opposite direction to electron flow. It highlights that early theories of electricity assumed the flow of positive charges, leading to the convention of defining current in that direction. Although it was later discovered that electrons, which carry negative charge, are the actual charge carriers in conductors, the original terminology was retained for consistency. Historical figures like James Clerk Maxwell contributed to this understanding, despite initially guessing the direction of flow incorrectly. Ultimately, the established convention persists for practical reasons in calculations and communication.
Taturana
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
Why is the electric current in the opposite direction of the flow of electrons?

One may say: "Oh, because the electric current represents the flow of positive charges"...

Okay, but why don't the theory use the electric current representing the flow of negative charges?

I heard from a professor that it is because in the beginning of the study of electricity "they" used to think that the electric current was caused by the flow of positive charges... then later they realized that it was caused by the flow of electrons (in the solid conductors) and then to don't remake the theory and to don't need to rewrite everything that was writen, they defined electric current as the flow of positive charges... (this was done because the direction of the flow of electrons does not make different for calculation purposes)... is my professor right?

Thank you,
Rafael Andreatta
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is due to convention. Usually things go from high to low. High would be considered positive. I am just guessing though.
 
Taturana said:
is my professor right?

Rafael Andreatta

Yes.
 
Electricity was discovered long before anyone had any idea that electrons even existed.
No-one could tell which way it was flowing - in fact there was a big argument about whether it was one thing flowing one way or two things flowing both ways.
James Clerk Maxwell decided it was probably just one thing and made a guess which way it flowed - he got it wrong!

Here's the book he wrote. If you ignore all the complicated maths it's interesting to read how he thought about it.

http://www.archive.org/stream/treatiseonelectr01maxwrich#page/n5/mode/2up"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top