Question about fluid mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenge of maintaining a solid body, specifically a sphere, in equilibrium over an orifice, with plans to extend the analysis to cubes and cylinders. The user is grappling with the forces acting on the portion of the sphere outside the vessel, while the buoyant force on the submerged part is straightforward to calculate. There is uncertainty about whether the problem can be solved with the current variables and if exploring simpler geometric shapes might provide useful insights. The role of atmospheric pressure and negligible viscosity is noted, but clarity on the overall goal of the analysis is lacking. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in fluid mechanics and the need for a structured approach to problem-solving in this context.
Perpendicular
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to work with the problem of keeping a solid body at equilibrium over an orifice.

To see what I mean ( not necessarily a sphere could be a cube or something like that as well ) please look at the image I have attached.

I am trying to work with the sphere case first and then move on to the case of cube and cylinder. In case of cylinder I am going to be working with the variables and solving for the fraction of the height I can keep outside. Also outside pressure is assumed to be atmospheric pressure and viscosity negligible. The rectangles at the bottom represent container walls.

I am not sure how to progress here, however. Does the problem even have a solution at all ? My basic issue lies with the part of the sphere outside the vessel as the part inside experiences an easily calculable force of buoyancy. However I am not sure how to progress after this. Have I taken too few variables and made the problem unsolvable by any chance ? Would it help me to examine some other geometric figure first as a learning precedent ?
 

Attachments

  • picture.JPG
    picture.JPG
    17.6 KB · Views: 510
Physics news on Phys.org
The OP gives no idea of what he is trying to determine.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top