Question About Flux of Surfaces: Need Explanation

Pippa
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have attached a file with my question.
From what i see the flux for both surfaces will be 0.
I am unsure and need a little of explaining
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Pippa said:
I have attached a file with my question.
From what i see the flux for both surfaces will be 0.
I am unsure and need a little of explaining

When you post a schoolwork question here on the PF, you are provided a Homework Help Template to fill out. Please get in the habit of doing that, instead of just deleting the Template. One reason is that the Template asks for you to list the Relevant Equations that apply to your question. Do you see how Gauss' Law could apply to your question?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss_law

.
 
well I have never learned any relevant equations this is more a logic question I think. Like this is calc 3 so its just touching on this topic
 
Hint: Electric flux is proportional to the number of electric field lines going through a virtual surface.
 
I need more than a hint since I am attending online school and i have to teach all the material to myself. So I basically learn the concepts through examples. For some reason I can't grasp this concept and need som explaining. I have not attended classes so hints are of no use to me
 
Pippa said:
well I have never learned any relevant equations this is more a logic question I think. Like this is calc 3 so its just touching on this topic

Pippa said:
I need more than a hint since I am attending online school and i have to teach all the material to myself. So I basically learn the concepts through examples. For some reason I can't grasp this concept and need som explaining. I have not attended classes so hints are of no use to me

I pointed you to the relevant equations. Please read the wikipedia page that I linked to -- it should start to answer your questions.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top