Question about how to interpret the graph of this waveform.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarvis323
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Waveform
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting a waveform graph related to a homework problem. The waveform is assumed to have a cycle of 3 seconds, with current values of 2, -2, and 0 over specified intervals. Participants clarify that the waveform may not be periodic, as it lacks nodes at the ends, suggesting it could represent a series of pulses rather than a continuous cycle. The context of the waveform is crucial for accurate interpretation, as it influences the understanding of charge movement over time. Ultimately, the graph indicates that charge movement starts in one direction, reverses, and then stops, without explicitly stating the charge values outside the defined intervals.
Jarvis323
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
988

Homework Statement



The question is in regards to a homework problem, but I only need clarification on how to interpret the graph of a waveform.

Homework Equations



N.A.

The Attempt at a Solution



N.A.

I've attached the image. I am assuming that one cycle of the waveform takes 3 seconds, such that i = 2 for one second, then -2 for 1 second, then 0 for one second, and then it repeats.

I am double checking that the cycle does not actually repeat every 2 seconds such that i = 2 for one second, then -2 for 1 second and then repeats.

It is probable obvious that the former is the case, but I just want to be sure, because there are only filled or open nodes drawn at t = 0, 1, and 2 seconds.

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • sc06c0133f.jpg
    sc06c0133f.jpg
    4.6 KB · Views: 472
Physics news on Phys.org
Graphs have to be interpreted in context of what you want to find out.
tldr: not enough information.

You have a graph of the function:
$$i(t)=\left \{
\begin{array}{rl}
0 & : t\leq 0\\ 2 & : 0<t\leq 1\\ -2 & : 1<t\leq 2 \\ 0 & : t > 2
\end{array}
\right .
$$

Open and closed nodes are inevitable since i(t) cannot have two values at one time.

Are you told that this represents the graph of one period of a periodic function with a period of 2s?
The range appears to be from t=-1s to t=+3s - judging by the plotted (solid) line. Maybe the period is 4s? Maybe it is just a couple of pulses? Context is everything.
 
The problem states that it is supposed that in a conductor, i(t) has the waveform shown below. Find and graph q(t). I have no problem finding and graphing q(t) I just wasn't sure about what is meant by waveform in this context. I guess I should assume that like you say that this is not a repeating wave, only a few blips?

My solution assumed that it was a repeating waveform where one cycle of the waveform takes 3 seconds, such that i = 2 for one second, then -2 for 1 second, then 0 for one second, and then it repeats. And is then
[ floor(t) mod 3 = 0 ] -> q(t) = 2(t - floor(t))
[ floor(t) mod 3 = 1 ] -> q(t) = 2 - 2(t - floor(t))
[ floor(t) mod 3 = 2 ] -> q(t) = 0

But I think you are probably right, the fact that no "nodes" exist on the two ends of the waveform must indicate that
(t <= 0) -> q(t) = 0
...
(t >= 2) -> q(t) = 0

Which makes the problem a lot simpler, but then it seams a little too easy.

The fact that it is said "has the waveform" throws me off because I think of a wave as cyclical, but I suppose a wave form can be any plot over any range right?
 
tAllan said:
The problem states that it is supposed that in a conductor, i(t) has the waveform shown below. Find and graph q(t). I have no problem finding and graphing q(t) I just wasn't sure about what is meant by waveform in this context. I guess I should assume that like you say that this is not a repeating wave, only a few blips?
That's how I'd have interpreted it, yes.

At t=0, charge starts moving one way, then at t=1 it starts moving the other way, at t=2 the movement stops. That's what the graph is saying. But it does not say that q(t)=0 for t<0 or t>2. It says that dq/dt=0 at those times.
Unless you happen to know q(0)=0 or something?
 
Back
Top