Question about Huygen's principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter toesockshoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
Huygens' principle explains that every point on a wave acts as a source of secondary wavelets, leading to interference patterns like those seen in single-slit experiments. However, when shining incoherent light from a bulb at a wall, the numerous random phases from multiple point-like emitters result in uniform illumination rather than distinct fringe patterns. A window can be viewed as a very wide single slit, where the interference effects become indistinguishable from classical optics. In contrast, coherent light sources, such as lasers, produce clear interference patterns due to their consistent phase relationships. Ultimately, while diffraction occurs with any light passing through an opening, the visibility of interference patterns depends on the coherence of the light source.
toesockshoe
Messages
265
Reaction score
2
Huygens principle states that every point on a wave is a source of a secondary wavelet, so when you shine a light at a single slit, you get fringe patters. How come when you shine a normal light at a wall (without any slit), you don't get fringe patters? Surely, if every point on a wave is a source of a secondary wave, then pointing a light at a wall means these infinite number of waves will interfere and produce constructive and destructive interference... Why can't we see these bright and dark spots on the wall though like we do in a single slit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You get the pattern that your source gives you: a laser pointer is like a very wide single slit, and will produce a very sharp single-slit pattern roughly as wide as the slit. Some approximations used for usual single slits are not valid here any more, but the idea is still the same.
A light bulb emits incoherent light, so you have the sum of many point-like emitters without any slit. The result is a uniform illumination.

A window is just a very wide single slit - so wide that the interference pattern is indistinguishable from classical optics with light rays.
 
toesockshoe said:
infinite number of waves will interfere and produce constructive and destructive interference.
A large number of sources, with random phases, will not produce any pattern because the sum at any point will be totally random. If you take a pair of small slits and allow white light from only one direction to go through them, then there is some amount of coherence and you may get a couple of nulls on either side of the on axis peak. Use a laser source and the coherence of the light over its whole width will be very high and the resulting pattern may be extremely wide, with many peaks and nulls.
But there will be diffraction when any light passes through any a hole or obstruction - it's just a matter of degree.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top