Question about optics (diffraction)

AI Thread Summary
When illuminating a hole and projecting the resulting diffraction pattern on a screen, the pattern initially decreases in size as the hole narrows, but eventually enlarges due to diffraction effects. The confusion arises from deriving the relationship between the screen pattern diameter, hole size, distance to the screen, and wavelength. The Kirchhoff integral theorem is considered for the derivation, although simpler methods may exist. The discussion reflects on the complexity of the topic, questioning whether it is still considered introductory physics. Understanding diffraction is essential for grasping these optical phenomena.
Gza
Messages
446
Reaction score
0
I was working out a practice test on optics and was a little confused about how to tackle this problem:


If you illuminate a hole and project the resulting pattern on a screen- as you decrease the hole size, the screen pattern gets smaller initially and then ultimately begins to grow larger. Why is this? Derive a formula for the screen pattern diameter as a function of the hole size, distance between screen and hole and the wavelength.


I know the effect is diffraction, but deriving the mentioned relation is giving me trouble. I was thinking of using the kirchhoff integral theorem, and then perhaps carrying out an integral over a rectangular aperature; but maybe that is overkill. Is their an easier way to start thinking about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gza said:
If you illuminate a hole and project the resulting pattern on a screen- as you decrease the hole size, the screen pattern gets smaller initially and then ultimately begins to grow larger. Why is this? Derive a formula for the screen pattern diameter as a function of the hole size, distance between screen and hole and the wavelength.
Is this considered introductory physics nowadays? :eek: I must be getting old.

Maybe this will help a bit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction
 
Lol, yeah this was probably a mispost; i got a chance to check the other posts in this section and realized it at that point. Thanks for the reference though galileo.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top