Question about projections and subspaces

JamesGoh
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
If we want to caculate the projection of a single vector, v=(1,2) (which is an element of an R2 vector space called V) onto the subspace of V (which we call W), do we use

projection of v onto W = <v,w1>w1 + <v,w2>w2 + ... <v,wn>wn

However, if the individual values of v are not known (that is v=(x,y) ), do we calculate the matrix of projection ?

that is, we do A(A^{T}A)^{-1}A^{T}

If we have to determine the matrix of projection, is it because we don't know what x and y is, so the safe bet is to determine the matrix of projection ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I really have no idea exactly what are asking. If you have a subspace, W, of an inner product space, V, and \{w_1, w2, ..., v_n\} is an orthonormal basis for W, then, yes, the projection of v, a vector in v, onto W is &lt;v, w_1&gt;w_1+ &lt;v, w_2&gt;w_2+ ...+ &lt;v, w_n&gt;wn. If you v is a "general" vector, then, yes, there exist a matrix such that multiplying any vector v by that matrix giives the projection. That is obviously true because projection is a linear operator. But I have no idea what you mean by "A(A^TA)^{-1}A^T" because I do not know what "A" is. Where did you get the matrix A?
 
sorry A is the matrix that is formed from the basis vectors in subspace W

where W = { basis 1, basis 2 }
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top