Question about resistance in a circuit

AI Thread Summary
In calculating resistance in a circuit using the formula R = ρ(ℓ/A), ℓ represents the length of the entire wire, not just the length across the battery. This means that when there are no resistors present, the total resistance is determined by the full length of the conductive material. The discussion confirms that the entire wire length is crucial for accurate resistance calculations. Understanding this concept is essential for analyzing circuit behavior effectively. Accurate resistance calculations depend on considering the entire wire length.
skwz
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Since:
R = \rho \frac{\ell}{A}
When calculating resistance in a circuit and let's say there are no resistors in the circuit, does \ell represent the length of the entire circuit (e.g. the length of the entire wire) or only the length across the battery?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it should be the length of entire wire
 
yes, l - length of the entire wire.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top