Question about Schrödinger equation interpretation

prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Im reading and thinking about the interpretation about Schrödinger equation s solutions (wave functions) - what they really mean.
What does the amplitude of wave function correspond to?
Does it mean that if amplitude is greater then energy of particle is greater as well ?
I would appreciate any help.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
prehisto said:
I'm reading and thinking about the interpretation about Schrödinger equation s solutions (wave functions) - what they really mean.
Depends what you mean by "really" ;)
What does the amplitude of wave function correspond to?
It corresponds to the probability amplitude ... it is it's own thing and does not have a physical meaning by itself. You know that the wave-function, along with it's complex conjugate, form the probability density function for the variable concerned. When you start out you normally have position wave-functions.

So ##\psi(x)## is the solution to Schrodinger's equation in x.
##\psi^\star(x)\psi(x)## is the probability density function for the particle in x.
##\int_a^b\psi^\star(x)\psi(x) dx## is the probability of finding the particle with x value between a and b.
Only this last one has a physical meaning ... the rest are steps in a calculation.

Does it mean that if amplitude is greater then energy of particle is greater as well ?
No. The amplitude is related to probability. In general, the energy is related to the number of anti-nodes in the wave-function ... in free-space, that would be proportional to the frequency.
 
Ok,thanks.
Yes, I was thinkinkg whether the amliptude has a physical interpretation.
 
Only natural.
It is no more physical than the magnitude of a classical probability density.
Technically it is more abstract than that - being a step removed. Some people find it a bit spooky - that such abstract ideas can have a physical impact. You'll find some people almost view the abstract math has having a deeper reality than the stuff you can measure.

Have a look at:
http://vega.org.uk/video/subseries/8
... for a glimpse of how things work.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top