Question about the matrix of vacuum to meson

Nixom
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have some questions about the matrix
<0|j^{\mu}_5|\pi(p)>=if_{\pi}p^{\mu}
1.Pi is a psuedoscalar particle, but the current between vacuum and pi state is an axial one, why not a psuedoscalar one?
And how do we determine the current appearing in the similar matrix like <0|j|meson>

2.The r.h.s is propotional to the momentum of the meson pi, but in the vector current case it is propotional to the polarization and mass
<0|j^{\mu}|Vector(p)>=if_{V}m_{V}e^{\mu}, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nixom said:
I have some questions about the matrix
<0|j^{\mu}_5|\pi(p)>=if_{\pi}p^{\mu}
1.Pi is a psuedoscalar particle, but the current between vacuum and pi state is an axial one, why not a psuedoscalar one?

That matrix element would also be nonzero. When we use an axial-vector current, the LHS is scalar * axial-vector * pseudoscalar and so the RHS is a vector (proportional to p). If we used a pseudoscalar operator, the LHS would be scalar * pseudoscalar * pseudoscalar and the RHS would be some scalar. Since the axial-vector matrix element is (part of) what determines the rate of weak decays of mesons, it seems appropriate to define the "decay constant" via the axial-vector matrix element.

Nixom said:
And how do we determine the current appearing in the similar matrix like <0|j|meson>

To define the decay constant of a given meson, you use the axial current with the same flavor quantum numbers as the meson. For example, for the decay constant of the ##K^+##, you use the current ##\bar{s}\gamma^\mu\gamma_5 u##.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top