Question about the photoelectric effect

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the efficiency of photodiodes in relation to the photoelectric effect, specifically questioning why photodiodes are not 100% efficient. It highlights that not all photons can cause electron emission, particularly if their wavelength is insufficient or if they miss electrons entirely. The work function of a metal may vary depending on the electron's position within the material. Additionally, photons can be absorbed by the lattice instead of causing emission, dissipating energy as heat. Understanding quantum efficiency is crucial to grasping these concepts fully.
Dima Petrukhin
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. The question asks why the photodiode is less than 100% efficient.2. hf=work function+KEmax


3.- I reckon this is as some light will not cause e to be emitted if the wavelength of the light is less the needed.
-Or some photons will not hit any electron.

Is this correct?
Thinking about this question got me wondering if the work function may vary in a metal depending on how 'deep' the electron is in the metal?

And is it possible for a single photon to go through the metal without hitting an electron and not causing emission?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I should say how close the electrons are to +ve metal ions
 
You say "photodiode" but you are describing the photoelectric effect. In a photodiode incoming photons create electron-hole pairs which are then detected as a current. This is not described by the equation hf=work function+KEmax.
Dima Petrukhin said:
And is it possible for a single photon to go through the metal without hitting an electron and not causing emission?
A single photon that does not cause emission does not have to go "through" the material. The photon's energy may be absorbed by the lattice and be dissipated as heat. Read about quantum efficiency here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_efficiency.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top