Question about torque and ladders.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr. Snookums
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating torque for a ladder leaning against a frictionless wall at an angle theta. It highlights the use of horizontal distance components with cosine for weights acting on the ladder and vertical distance components with sine for the force exerted by the wall. The reason for this difference is that vertical forces require horizontal perpendicular distances, while horizontal forces require vertical distances. The relationship between sine and cosine in right triangles is also mentioned to explain the angle dynamics. Understanding these components is crucial for accurately applying torque equations in this scenario.
Mr. Snookums
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
A ladder is against a frictionless wall, elevated at angle theta above the ground.

I have a question about distance components. We find the torque pushing the ladder to the ground by using horizontal distance components: the distances of the weights acting on the ladder multiplied each by cosine of theta. What is strange is that we use a vertical distance component when finding the force exerted by the wall onto the ladder: distance from the ground to where the ladder touches the wall multiplied by sine of theta.

Why don't we use cosine as we did for the others?

Sorry if I am unclear, I really don't know how to put it another way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In each case you need to find the perpendicular distance from the axis to the line of the force. For vertical forces, the perpendicular distances are horizontal. To find the horizontal component of a distance along the ladder, cosine is used. But for horizontal forces, the perpendicular distances are vertical--that requires the sine.

Another way to think of it is to examine the angles of the right triangle formed by the ladder. Realize that if two angles (theta1 & theta2) add up to 90 degrees, then sin(theta1) = cos(theta2). (And vice versa.)
 
I understand that, but why would we use both vertical and horizontal components in the same torque equation?
 
Because the forces due to gravity act vertically, while the wall force acts horizontally.

Why don't you tell me the definition of torque that your book uses. (There are several equivalent definitions of torque.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top