Question about what schedule pipe I should use for slackline

  • Thread starter Thread starter DJones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pipe Schedule
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting the appropriate schedule pipe for slackline anchors being installed near a pool. The user is considering schedule 160 but is advised by a fabricator that schedule 40 may suffice. However, the user prioritizes safety due to the potential high loads on the anchors, which could reach up to 3000 lbs with multiple users. The thread is ultimately closed for moderation, and users are advised to consult their home insurance for additional liability coverage related to the slackline setup. Liability concerns are emphasized as a critical aspect of the project.
DJones
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
HI All,

I'm currently working on getting some anchors built for a slackline. These will be in ground and have removeable pipes to be hidden when not in use. I talked to my father who was an engineer for the better part of 40 years to get an initial design and parts list. I've posted what he drew up.

The fabricator has pushed back saying schedule 160 is overkill, which it very may well be, and we should consider just using schedule 40 but I'd rather be safe than sorry. These anchors are being place on either side of a pool, built in with the deck so failure would be more costly than just replacing anchors + pipe.

With this design, and a ~3' rise out of the ground of pipe, slickline connected at about 6" from the top. The total load on the line can range from about 500 lbs of force to about 1800 lbs of force for a single user. If multiple users that might increase upwards to 3000lbs of force depending on the preload of the line.

What would you suggest to use for the type of pipe for both the anchor sleeve and mounting pipe that get inserted into the anchor?

Thank you for any help.
 

Attachments

  • unnamed.jpg
    unnamed.jpg
    31.4 KB · Views: 460
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
Welcome to the PF.

Sorry, but due to liability reasons, we cannot help you with that project. The thread will remain closed.

You and your parents should also contact your home insurance carrier to discuss adding extra liability coverage for your slackline. It most likely is not covered by the standard home policy, especially if you will be allowing guests to use it.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top