Question from my Kinematics Exam.

  • Thread starter Thread starter x2468
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
A user struggled with a kinematics exam question about a car accelerating from rest and traveling 81 meters in 9 seconds, initially thinking the acceleration was 9 m/s². After recalculating, they determined the correct acceleration to be 2 m/s², which was confirmed by another participant in the discussion. The formula used for the calculation was a = 2d/t², leading to the conclusion that the acceleration is indeed 2 m/s² under constant acceleration. The confusion stemmed from mixing up units of measurement. Overall, the user correctly identified the acceleration as 2 m/s².
x2468
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
okay this is really retarded. but i actually got stuck on this question today. i think it went something like:
a car accelerated from rest and traveled 81 meters in 9 seconds. what was its acceleration?
it was like the simplest Q on the exam. but i cept thinking it must be 9m/s/s because in the first second its going 9, then 18, so on and so on to 81 meters in 9 seconds? but i did the math and got 2 m/s/s. I am still not totally sure. 9 and 2 were both choices. i went with 2. right chocie or wrong?
|
|
|
upon writing this, i think i simply got m/s mixed up with m/s/s:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a = 2d/t^2

a= 2m/s/s

9m/s/s is really fast, like crotch rocket fast
 
y=y_0+v_0t+ \frac{at^2}{2}

81.0= 0+ 0+ \frac{a(9)^2}{2}

so a= 2,

you got it right. (I assumed constant acceleration).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top