Question on acceleration and string-HELP

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aleksandar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between the separations of weights tied to a string when dropped under the influence of gravity. It questions how the distances between weights (L1, L2, etc.) relate to the initial separation (L0) if the sounds made upon landing form a steady beat, indicating constant acceleration. The conversation also explores the difference between using strings versus rigid poles for the weights and seeks clarification on kinematic equations that connect acceleration, velocity, and position. Additionally, it examines the implications of pushing weights together at constant speed on a horizontal surface compared to their behavior under constant acceleration. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for detailed explanations and hints to grasp these concepts better.
Aleksandar
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I need big help on this question guys:

One test for the effects of the acceleration of gravity is to tie a set of weights to a string, with the second lowest searated from the lowes by L0, the third lowest from the second lowest by L1, and so forth, and to then drop the string. Suposing that free fall corresponds to motion with constant acceleration, how would separations L1, L2,...,Ln (where n is the number of weights) be related to L0 if the sounds made by the weights as they land form a steady beat? The lowest weight starts at the surface onto which the other weights fall.

I NEED HUGE HELP FOR THIS QUESTION
PLEASE HELP ME
If you can also explain me into more detail so I can get it easily.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the acceleration of gravity is constant, what is the difference between having strings between the objects, and having rigid poles? Is there any difference? If not, why not?

What is the kinematic equation that relates the acceleration of an object to its velocity and position?
 
I still don't get it. Can you explain the question in detail. Can you guys please give me more hints if possible. PLEASE
 
MASSIVE HINT: Is the distance between the weights going to change? Note that as berkeman said, the acceleration experienced by each object is constant and equal. Note also that all the weights begin from rest (vi=0) and the bottom weight starts on the surface (x0=0)
 
Aleksandar said:
I still don't get it. Can you explain the question in detail. Can you guys please give me more hints if possible. PLEASE

What happens if you have four weights separated by strings of equal length on a horizontal surface, and then push them together at a constant speed (i.e., no acceleration)? You get Hup two three four, or BONG BONG BONG BONG, equally spaced sounds. This is related to the equation of motion for constant velocity and distance: x = vt.

What is the equivalent equation of motion for constant acceleration, and how does this change the situation for the four weights?

Dorothy
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top