Question on Energy conservation - Car pushing on air column

pavantgpk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Question on Energy conservation -- Car pushing on air column

Homework Statement


An automobile moving through the air causes the air velocity to decrease and fill a larger flow channel. An automobile has an effective flow channel area of 3 m^2. THe car is traveling at 90 k/h on a day when the barometric pressure is 75 cm of mercury and the temperature is 30 C. Behind the car, the air veloctiy is measured to be 82 km/h, and the temperature is 30 C. Determine the power required to move this car through the air and the effective flow channel behind the car?


Homework Equations



Here we need to find the mass flow rate through (A1V1)/specific volume and calculate the change in kinetic energy of the wind

The Attempt at a Solution


The only part I don't understand is how the power required by the car is equal to energy change of the wind and how the velocity of the wind initially is 90kmph?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only part I don't understand is how the power required by the car is equal to energy change of the wind
Neglecting other losses, this is just energy conservation.
and how the velocity of the wind initially is 90kmph?
As seen by the car, what else do you expect?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top