Why is the formula for potential energy in a spring 1/2(kd^2) instead of kd^2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sodr2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Forces
AI Thread Summary
The formula for potential energy in a spring is E = 1/2(kd^2) because it represents the area under the force vs. displacement graph, which forms a triangle, not a rectangle. The force exerted by the spring, according to Hooke's law, is F = kx, and work done (W) is calculated as W = Fd. Since the graph is triangular, the area (work done) is calculated as 1/2(base)(height), leading to the factor of 1/2 in the potential energy equation. The discussion clarifies that while the formula E = kd^2 might seem plausible, it does not account for the nature of the force's change over distance. Understanding the integral of the force function is essential for deriving the correct potential energy formula.
sodr2
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I just watched this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVl5zs6Lqy0" video...

If W = KE ---> Fd = [mv^2] / 2

If in a spring, force is equal to a constant (k) times how far its been stretched (d), then subbing kd for F in the first equation...

Kd^2 = [mv^2]/2
Rearranging, E = kd^2

But in my textbook, it says that E = 1/2 [kd^2]
Where did the 1/2 come from? Even in the video, W = Fd, so from the graph, you times F by d, getting a SQUARE, not a triangle, but he says you times F by d, and divide by 2 since your looking at the area (triangle) underneath...

Any help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
sodr2 said:
I just watched this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVl5zs6Lqy0" video...

If W = KE ---> Fd = [mv^2] / 2

If in a spring, force is equal to a constant (k) times how far its been stretched (d), then subbing kd for F in the first equation...

Kd^2 = [mv^2]/2
Rearranging, E = kd^2

But in my textbook, it says that E = 1/2 [kd^2]
Where did the 1/2 come from? Even in the video, W = Fd, so from the graph, you times F by d, getting a SQUARE, not a triangle, but he says you times F by d, and divide by 2 since your looking at the area (triangle) underneath...

Any help?

U = \frac{1}2kx^2

is the potential energy of the spring. You're talking about the kinetic energy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay...

If on a F vs x graph, you want to find work...

F = k x
W = F d

Then shouldn't work = k xd = kx^2?
 
sodr2 said:
Okay...

If on a F vs x graph, you want to find work...

F = k x
W = F d

Then shouldn't work = k xd = kx^2?

Yes...but the net work is only equal to the change in kinetic energy. What your book is saying (spring's potential energy) has nothing to do with what you're saying. For a conservative force (ie. only a position-dependent force) like Hooke's law, the force will equal the negative gradient of the potential. So now we have:

F = -kx

Take integral and get:

U = \frac{1}2kx^2
 
Last edited:
https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/24/2483850-2.png
whats that big s line thing for lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top