Question on Laws of Motion observed in Real Life

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observation that a heavier boy slides farther down a water slide than a lighter boy, despite greater friction acting on the heavier individual. The explanation highlights that momentum, defined as p=mv, plays a crucial role, as the heavier boy has more momentum, requiring more force to stop him. Additionally, factors such as air resistance and fluid dynamics in water contribute to the differences in stopping distances. The conversation also notes that clothing and body positioning can affect friction and speed on the slide. Ultimately, the laws of motion do not account for these real-life variables, leading to the observed discrepancies in their sliding distances.
rajumahtora
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
When I had a school tour to A water park, there I observed that when a heavy boy used to slide down a water slide(and stop at β), he used to go further than where the ligher boy used to stop after sliding(α).
But the friction will act more on Heavier then why is he going further?
attachment.php?attachmentid=65768&stc=1&d=1390048714.jpg
 

Attachments

  • paint.jpg
    paint.jpg
    5.9 KB · Views: 664
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming both the heavy boy and lighter boy are moving with the same velocity, I think its probably because the heavy boy will have more momentum than the lighter boy, p=mv, thus as compared to the lighter boy more friction will be required to stop the heavy boy.Therefore he travels farther.
 
rajumahtora said:
But the friction will act more on Heavier then why is he going further?

You're right about the frictional force: It's proportional to the normal force between boy and slide, and that's proportional to the weight so should stop them both at the same point.

That's not what you've observed, so you have to conclude that there is some other force at work as well, one that is not proportional to the weight so Heavy's momentum will carry him farther against that force. Air resistance is a good candidate, and on a water slide fluid resistance from the water is also possible.
 
Last edited:
Was the light boy wearing a pool shirt and the heavy boy not wearing a pool shirt? This has a big frictional effect on water slides if the people are lying down.
 
Your terminal speed will depend upon the resultant of your weight force and the resistance forces. The larger boy will have much greater weight force but very similar resistance forces. There are other factors at work when they use different mats or clothing or learn the speed technique of holding their body in the optimum shape.

The simple laws of motion assume no friction so they predict the same acceleration and final speed for both boys. Taken to extremes, in a practical situation, the terminal velocity of a mouse, falling through air, is low enough for it to be thrown off the Empire State Building and for it to walk away from the experience. Unlike the situation for an elephant. (Not Dumbo, of course)
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top